Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shefeeque and ors. Vs. State of Kerala

Shefeeque and ors. vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 26, 2010
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/907433

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
B.A. No. 6628 of 2010
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 34, 504, 506; Code Of Criminal procedure (CRPC), 1973 - Sections 394, 161. - Punishment for murder -- The accused Hari Singh of village Suthari was running a brick kiln on the outskirts of the village. Subsequently, one Randhir Singh installed another brick kiln nearby. ...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 447, 341, 323, 324, 354 and 326 read with 34

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shefeeque and ors.

Advocate SRI.ALAN PAPALI, Adv.

Respondent

State of Kerala

Legal References

Acts
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 447, 341, 323, 324, 354 and 326 read with 34

Excerpt

indian penal code (ipc), 1860 - sections 302, 34, 504, 506; code of criminal procedure (crpc), 1973 - sections 394, 161. - punishment for murder -- the accused hari singh of village suthari was running a brick kiln on the outskirts of the village. subsequently, one randhir singh installed another brick kiln nearby. hari singh and his brothers, however, did not allow randhir singh to run his brick kiln effectively and ultimately randhir singh sold his brick kiln to gulab singh deceased some three months prior to the incident. sub-inspector hari raj singh, however, recorded the statements of the witnesses and after inspecting the site, prepared the site plan ex. ka.14. the prosecution in support of its case relied primarily on the evidence of pw1 prem pal, pw-5 kalu and pw-6 jagdish, pw-2 dr. m.k.goel, who had conducted the autopsy on the dead body, and of pw-7 sub-inspector hari raj singh, the main investigating officer. point "a" in the site plan is the place where the deceased gulab singh had been shot and killed. o r d e rv. ramkumar, j. ................................... b.a. no. 6628 of 2010 ............................................... dated: 26th day of october, 2010 order 1. petitioners, who are accused nos. 1 to 4 in crime no.1081/2010 of pathanapuram police station for offences punishable under sections 447, 341, 323, 324, 354 and 326 read with 34 ipc, seek anticipatory bail. 2. the learned public prosecutor opposed the application. 3. anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. but at the same time, i am inclined to permit the petitioners to surrender before the investigating officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have their application for bail considered by the magistrate having jurisdiction. accordingly, the petitioners shall surrender before the investigating officer on 11.11.2010 or on 12.11.2010 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. after interrogation, petitioners shall be produced before the magistrate concerned who on being convinced that the petitioners have been interrogated by the police, shall release the petitioners on bail on each of them executing a bond for rs.15,000/- (rupees fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the magistrate and subject to the following conditions:- 1. the petitioners shall report before the investigating officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all wednesdays. 2. the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation including custodial interrogation as and when required by the investigating officer. 3. the petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution. 4. the petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail. 5. if the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled. this petition is disposed of as above.

Full Judgment

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

...................................

B.A. No. 6628 of 2010

...............................................

Dated: 26th day of October, 2010

ORDER

1. Petitioners, who are accused Nos. 1 to 4 in Crime No.1081/2010 of Pathanapuram Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 324, 354 and 326 read with 34 IPC, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

3. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioners to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have their application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioners shall surrender before the investigating officer on 11.11.2010 or on 12.11.2010 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. After interrogation, petitioners shall be produced before the Magistrate concerned who on being convinced that the petitioners have been interrogated by the police, shall release the petitioners on bail on each of them executing a bond for Rs.15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate and subject to the following conditions:-

1. The petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

2. The petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation including custodial interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

3. The petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

4. The petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail.

5. If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled.

This petition is disposed of as above.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial