Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Samrat Jun Jayanth and anr Vs. Directorate of Medical Education and ors

Samrat Jun Jayanth and anr vs Directorate of Medical Education and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Nov 10, 2010
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/907089

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WRIT PETITION NOs.33881-882/2010 (EDM AD)
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[S. ABDUL NAZEER J.] These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the R-2 to relive the l&t petitioner and admit the 2nd petitioner to their college in pursuance of the order passed by R-l dated 28.9.2010 as per Annexure-C and etc.

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Samrat Jun Jayanth and anr

Advocate Sri. V.N. Madhava Reddy. Adv.

Respondent

Directorate of Medical Education and ors

Advocate Sri. M. Keshavareddy, AGA; Sri. N.K. Ramesh, Adv

Excerpt

[s. abdul nazeer j.] these writ petitions are filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to direct the r-2 to relive the l&t petitioner and admit the 2nd petitioner to their college in pursuance of the order passed by r-l dated 28.9.2010 as per annexure-c and etc......petitioners have filed these writ petitions for a direction to the 2nd respondent to relieve the 1st petitioner and admit the 2nd petitioner to his place in conformity with the order passed by the director of medical education. bangalore, at annexure-c.2. i have heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned aga for that is' respondent and sri. n.k. ramesh, learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. though the 2nd respondent is served, it has remained unrepresented.3. it is evading from trie materials on record that pursuant to the order of allotment by the cet. the 1st petitioner had joined the 2nc: respondent-college and the 2nd petitioner had joined the msr college. the petitioners have sought for mutual transfer, which has been permitted by the director of medical education. bangalore as per the order at annexure-c dated 28.09.2010. in pursuance thereof, the msr college has issued the relieving order enabling the 2nd petitioner to join the 2nd respondent-college. therefore, the 2nd respondent-college has to relieve the is1 petitioner to enable him to join the msr college.4. therefore. i direct the 2nd respondent to relieve the is' petitioner to enable him to join the msr college. bangalore, and to admit the 2nd petitioner in his place for the study of the is' year mbbs course for the academic year 2010-201 1 immediately on receipt of a copy of this order. writ petitions are accordingly allowed. no costs.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. The Is' petitioner had joined the 2,ul respondent-College for the study of the lsl year MBBS Course for the academic year 2010-2011 pursuant to the allotment of the seat by the CET. Similarly, the 2nd petitioner had joined M.S. Ramaiah Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Bangalore (for short 'the MSR College), for the study of the 1st year MBBS Course for the academic year 2010-2011. This seat was allotted by the CET. The petitioners made a request to the Director of Medical Education. Bangalore for mutual transfer of their seats. The Director of Medical Education. Bangalore, by his order dated 23.09.2010 has permitted the 1st petitioner to join the MSR College in place of the 2nd petitioner and the 2,d petitioner was permitted to join the 2nd respondent-College in place of the 1sl petitioner. The order of the Director of Medical Education. Bangalore is at Annexure-C. The MSR College has issued a relieving order dated 9.10.2010 as per Annexure-D whereby the 2nd petitioner was relieved from the said college to enable him to join, the 2nd respondent-College. However, the 2nd respondent-College has not issued the relieving order to enable the 1st petitioner to join the MSR College. Therefore, the petitioners have filed these writ petitions for a direction to the 2nd respondent to relieve the 1st petitioner and admit the 2nd petitioner to his place in conformity with the order passed by the Director of Medical Education. Bangalore, at Annexure-C.

2. I have heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for that is' respondent and Sri. N.K. Ramesh, learned Counsel for the 3rd respondent. Though the 2nd respondent is served, it has remained unrepresented.

3. It is evading from trie materials on record that pursuant to the order of allotment by the CET. the 1st petitioner had joined the 2nc: respondent-College and the 2nd petitioner had joined the MSR College. The petitioners have sought for mutual transfer, which has been permitted by the Director of Medical Education. Bangalore as per the order at Annexure-C dated 28.09.2010. In pursuance thereof, the MSR College has issued the relieving order enabling the 2nd petitioner to join the 2nd respondent-College. Therefore, the 2nd respondent-College has to relieve the IS1 petitioner to enable him to join the MSR College.

4. Therefore. I direct the 2nd respondent to relieve the IS' petitioner to enable him to join the MSR College. Bangalore, and to admit the 2nd petitioner in his place for the study of the IS' year MBBS Course for the academic year 2010-201 1 immediately on receipt of a copy of this order. Writ petitions are accordingly allowed. No costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial