Dinesh Vs. State

Dinesh vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Dec 02, 2010

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/906859

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/906859
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: Shiv Narayan Dhingra .J.
Decided On: Dec 02, 2010
Case Number: Crl. M.B. 1101 of 2010 in Crl. A. No. 930 of 2010
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA J.] This writ petition is tiled under Article 227 of the Constitution of Lidia praying to set aside the order of the learned City Civil Judge, Bangalore City, sitting in Court. Hall No.8 in Aacexure-E order dated 2.11.2010 in O.S.No.8185/2003 rejecting the prayer of the petitioner for issue cf...

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dinesh

Advocate Ms. Tanveer Ahmed Mir; Mr. Pratik Batta, Advs.

Respondent

State

Advocate Mr. Sunil Sharma, Adv.

Excerpt

[a.n. venugopala gowda j.] this writ petition is tiled under article 227 of the constitution of lidia praying to set aside the order of the learned city civil judge, bangalore city, sitting in court. hall no.8 in aacexure-e order dated 2.11.2010 in o.s.no.8185/2003 rejecting the prayer of the petitioner for issue cf notice to the proposed defendants.1. this application for suspension of sentence has been made by the applicant who has filed an appeal against his conviction under section 376 ipc. the applicant was sentenced to 10 years r.i. for raping a minor girl of around six years of age.2. the counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and the identification of the applicant by the prosecutrix and her mother did not inspired confidence.3. i have gone through the testimony of witnesses. i consider that it is not a fit case for suspension of sentence at this stage. however, the appeal of the appellant be heard expeditiously and be listed for hearing on 7th february, 2011

Full Judgment

1. This application for suspension of sentence has been made by the applicant who has filed an appeal against his conviction under Section 376 IPC. The applicant was sentenced to 10 years R.I. for raping a minor girl of around six years of age.

2. The counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and the identification of the applicant by the prosecutrix and her mother did not inspired confidence.

3. I have gone through the testimony of witnesses. I consider that it is not a fit case for suspension of sentence at this stage. However, the appeal of the appellant be heard expeditiously and be listed for hearing on 7th February, 2011

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2010 Same Parties Dinesh vs State Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Shiv Narayan Dhingra .J.

Criminal