Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Suresh and ors Vs. the State

Suresh and ors vs The State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Dec 08, 2010
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/906837

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Application No. 1606/2010
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA J.] This writ petition is tiled under Article 227 of the Constitution of Lidia praying to set aside the order of the learned City Civil Judge, Bangalore City, sitting in Court. Hall No.8 in Aacexure-E order dated 2.11.2010 in O.S.No.8185/2003 rejecting the prayer of the petitioner for issue cf...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Suresh and ors

Advocate Mr. J.S.Kushwaha, Adv

Respondent

The State

Advocate Mr. O.P.Saxena,Adv

Legal References

Acts
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302

Excerpt

[a.n. venugopala gowda j.] this writ petition is tiled under article 227 of the constitution of lidia praying to set aside the order of the learned city civil judge, bangalore city, sitting in court. hall no.8 in aacexure-e order dated 2.11.2010 in o.s.no.8185/2003 rejecting the prayer of the petitioner for issue cf notice to the proposed defendants.the applicants/petitioners who are facing trial under section 302 ipc have sought bail during pendency of the trial on the ground that the evidence recorded so far does not show involvement of the petitioners. i have perused the statement of pw-1 shanti devi and the statement would show that the claim made by the counsel for the applicants that no evidence had come against the accused was totally false. not only shanti devi supported the prosecution's case but even other witnesses also supported the case of the prosecution. the testimony of shanti devi cannot be doubted because she is one of the injured who received 25% burn injuries at the hands of the accused, while the deceased received 100% burn injuries and died. i find no force in the application. the bail application is hereby dismissed.

Full Judgment

The applicants/petitioners who are facing trial under Section 302 IPC have sought bail during pendency of the trial on the ground that the evidence recorded so far does not show involvement of the petitioners. I have perused the statement of PW-1 Shanti Devi and the statement would show that the claim made by the Counsel for the applicants that no evidence had come against the accused was totally false. Not only Shanti Devi supported the prosecution's case but even other witnesses also supported the case of the prosecution. The testimony of Shanti Devi cannot be doubted because she is one of the injured who received 25% burn injuries at the hands of the accused, while the deceased received 100% burn injuries and died. I find no force in the application. The bail application is hereby dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial