Rakesh Saraha Vs. State

Rakesh Saraha vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Dec 06, 2010

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/906765

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/906765
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: Shiv Narayan Dhingra, J.
Decided On: Dec 06, 2010
Case Number: W.P(Crl.) 1419/2010
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA J.] This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India praying to call for entire records in O.S,No,8698/2006 on the file of City Civil Judge at Bangalore,

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rakesh Saraha

Advocate Ms. Neha Jain, Adv

Respondent

State

Advocate Mr. Sunil Sharma, Adv

Excerpt

[a.n. venugopala gowda j.] this writ petition is filed under articles 226 & 227 of the constitution of india praying to call for entire records in o.s,no,8698/2006 on the file of city civil judge at bangalore,1. whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2. to be referred to the reporter or not?3. whether judgment should be reported in digest? 1. by way of present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed an order 9th august 2010 whereby the application of petitioner for grant of parole was dismissed.2. the petitioner is undergoing sentence for ransom kidnapping. his appeal was dismissed by this court on 14th december 2007. it seems that the petitioner was a hardened criminal as he was involved in another case of ransom kidnapping for which he is facing trial. looking at the antecedents of the petitioner, i am afraid there is every possibility that the petitioner if released on parole, may indulge into another heinous crime. i find no reason to allow this petition. the petition is hereby dismissed.

Full Judgment

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporter or not?

3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?

1. By way of present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed an order 9th August 2010 whereby the application of petitioner for grant of parole was dismissed.

2. The petitioner is undergoing sentence for ransom kidnapping. His appeal was dismissed by this Court on 14th December 2007. It seems that the petitioner was a hardened criminal as he was involved in another case of ransom kidnapping for which he is facing trial. Looking at the antecedents of the petitioner, I am afraid there is every possibility that the petitioner if released on parole, may indulge into another heinous crime. I find no reason to allow this petition. The petition is hereby dismissed.

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2010 Same Parties Rakesh Saraha vs State Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Shiv Narayan Dhingra, J.

Land Acquisition