Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Richard Vs. Mobile

Richard vs Mobile

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-24-1908
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/90516

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
208 U.S. 480
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Richard

Respondent

Mobile

Excerpt

richard v. mobile - 208 u.s. 480 (1908) u.s. supreme court richard v. mobile, 208 u.s. 480 (1908) richard v. mobile no. 112 argued january 17, 1908 decided february 24, 1908 208 u.s. 480 appeal from the circuit court of the united states for the southern district of alabama syllabus decided on the authority of phillips v. city of mobile, ante, p. 208 u. s. 472 . the facts are stated in the opinion. mr. justice peckham delivered the opinion of the court. this is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court of the united states for the southern district of alabama sustaining the demurrer of the city of mobile to a bill filed by the appellants and dismissing the same. it appears that the appellants sought to obtain an injunction to restrain the city from collecting the amount of the license tax imposed under the ordinance of the city upon those who were engaged in selling beer in the city by the barrel, half-barrel, or quarter-barrel. page 208 u. s. 481 the question involved is, as counsel for appellant admits, identical with that which has just been decided in the foregoing case, no. 113, and for the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Full Judgment

Richard v. Mobile - 208 U.S. 480 (1908)
U.S. Supreme Court Richard v. Mobile, 208 U.S. 480 (1908)

Richard v. Mobile

No. 112

Argued January 17, 1908

Decided February 24, 1908

208 U.S. 480

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SYLLABUS

Decided on the authority of Phillips v. City of Mobile, ante, p. 208 U. S. 472 .

The facts are stated in the opinion.

MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Alabama sustaining the demurrer of the City of Mobile to a bill filed by the appellants and dismissing the same. It appears that the appellants sought to obtain an injunction to restrain the city from collecting the amount of the license tax imposed under the ordinance of the city upon those who were engaged in selling beer in the city by the barrel, half-barrel, or quarter-barrel.

Page 208 U. S. 481

The question involved is, as counsel for appellant admits, identical with that which has just been decided in the foregoing case, No. 113, and for the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the circuit court is

Affirmed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial