P.Vellaisamy. Vs. the Inspector General of Prisons, and ors.

P.Vellaisamy. vs The Inspector General of Prisons, and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jul 28, 2010

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/905032

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/905032
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: T.Raja, J.
Decided On: Jul 28, 2010
Case Number: W.P.No.31186 of 2006 (T) O.A.No.8871 of 1998
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

PRAYER: Writ Petition came to be numbered by transfer of O.A.No.8871 of 1998 on the file of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal praying to call for the entire records pertaining to the impugned order of stoppage of increment order Se.Mu.A.No.13973/PO-1/97, dated 10.12.97 and consequential order (3rd respondent) r...

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.Vellaisamy.

Respondent

The Inspector General of Prisons, and ors.

Advocate Mr.S.Gopinathan, Adv.

Excerpt

prayer: writ petition came to be numbered by transfer of o.a.no.8871 of 1998 on the file of the tamil nadu administrative tribunal praying to call for the entire records pertaining to the impugned order of stoppage of increment order se.mu.a.no.13973/po-1/97, dated 10.12.97 and consequential order (3rd respondent) removed from service in his proceedings no.35376/e2(4)/98, dated 13.10.98 (1st respondent) and his proceedings no.se.mu.no.7504/po-1/98, dated 22.10.98(3rd respondent) and set aside the same and further direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant in service with all consequential benefits.1. the writ petition has been listed today under the caption "for dismissal", since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 27.07.2010. even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. hence, the writ petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. no costs.

Full Judgment

1. The Writ Petition has been listed today under the caption "for dismissal", since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 27.07.2010. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2010 Same Parties P.Vellaisamy. vs The Inspector General of Prisons, and ors. Same Subject Education Same Judge T.Raja, J.

Education