Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

United States Vs. Herr

United States vs Herr

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-14-1908
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/90400

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
211 U.S. 406
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

United States

Respondent

Herr

Excerpt

united states v. herr - 211 u.s. 406 (1908) u.s. supreme court united states v. herr, 211 u.s. 406 (1908) united states v. herr no. 292 argued october 15, 1908 decided december 14, 1908 211 u.s. 406 error to the district court of the united states for the district of colorado syllabus decided on the authority of united states v. keitel, ante, p. 211 u. s. 370 . 157 f. 396 affirmed. the facts are stated in the opinion. mr. justice white delivered the opinion of the court. the indictment in this case contains two counts, each purporting to charge the commission of an offense in violation of rev.stat., § 4746, as amended. the substantial charge in each count is that the defendant unlawfully procured a named person, in connection with a preferential entry of coal lands, to make and present to the secretary of the interior, by and through the register and receiver of the united states land office at durango, colorado, an affidavit at purchase, which was false and fraudulent in specified particulars. a demurrer to the indictment was filed, and the validity of each count was assailed on many grounds. in disposing of the demurrer, it was assumed by the district page 211 u. s. 407 judge, as conceded by the government, that the affidavit was not, in fact presented to the secretary of the interior, but was simply filed in the local land office. the demurrer was sustained "for reasons given on consideration of the second count in the indictment" in the case against f. w. keitel et al. the case at bar comes within the principles applied by us in no. 287, just decided, where, in passing upon the rulings made below in the keitel case, it was held that the second count of the indictment there considered, when the statute was correctly construed, stated no offense. the judgment below, which involved a similar ruling, is therefore affirmed.

Full Judgment

United States v. Herr - 211 U.S. 406 (1908)
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Herr, 211 U.S. 406 (1908)

United States v. Herr

No. 292

Argued October 15, 1908

Decided December 14, 1908

211 U.S. 406

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

SYLLABUS

Decided on the authority of United States v. Keitel, ante, p. 211 U. S. 370 .

157 F. 396 affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

The indictment in this case contains two counts, each purporting to charge the commission of an offense in violation of Rev.Stat., § 4746, as amended.

The substantial charge in each count is that the defendant unlawfully procured a named person, in connection with a preferential entry of coal lands, to make and present to the Secretary of the Interior, by and through the register and receiver of the United States land office at Durango, Colorado, an affidavit at purchase, which was false and fraudulent in specified particulars. A demurrer to the indictment was filed, and the validity of each count was assailed on many grounds. In disposing of the demurrer, it was assumed by the district

Page 211 U. S. 407

judge, as conceded by the government, that the affidavit was not, in fact presented to the Secretary of the Interior, but was simply filed in the local land office.

The demurrer was sustained "for reasons given on consideration of the second count in the indictment" in the case against F. W. Keitel et al. The case at bar comes within the principles applied by us in No. 287, just decided, where, in passing upon the rulings made below in the Keitel case, it was held that the second count of the indictment there considered, when the statute was correctly construed, stated no offense. The judgment below, which involved a similar ruling, is therefore

Affirmed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial