Santhoshkumar Vs. State of Kerala

Santhoshkumar vs State of Kerala

Disposition Petition allowed Court Kerala Decided Jun 22, 2010

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/903552

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/903552
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: K. Hema, J.,
Decided On: Jun 22, 2010
Case Number: Bail Appl. No. 3653 of 2010
Subject: Criminal
Disposition: Petition allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Key legal issue: Criminal
Outcome / disposition: Petition allowed
Acts & sections: Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 420, 465, 468 and 471

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Santhoshkumar

Advocate P. Vijaya Bhanu, Adv.

Respondent

State of Kerala

Advocate No Appearance

Legal References

Acts: Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 420, 465, 468 and 471

Excerpt

- .....to kerala. the demand drafts were produced towards value added tax to be paid by dealers while transporting live chicken from other states to kerala. a huge loss to the tune of rs. 14 crores was caused to the government. the offences were detected when the demand drafts were sent to bank.3. petitioner was taken into custody on 30.1.2010. 25 cases were registered against him. the arrest of petitioner in this case was recorded on 28.4.2010. in all the cases together, petitioner is in custody for the past about five months. learned public prosecutor submitted that he has no objection in granting bail, taking into consideration the stage of investigation and the fact that certain co-accused were granted bail. petitioner himself was granted bail in some other cases.4. on hearing both sides, i am satisfied that bail can be granted to petitioner on conditions. hence, the following order is passed:petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing a bond for rs. 50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court concerned, on the following conditions: (i) petitioner shall report before the investigating officer on every monday and thursday between 10 a.m. and 1 p.m. for a period of two months and thereafter, on every monday, until charge sheet is filed or until further orders. (ii) petitioner shall not influence or intimidate any witness or tamper with evidence. (iii) in case the petitioner is involved in any offence of similar nature, his bail is liable to be cancelled.petition is allowed.

Full Judgment

ORDER

K. Hema, J.

1. This petition is for bail.

2. The alleged offences are under Sections 120B, 420, 465, 468 and 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. According to prosecution, petitioner(A5) committed forgery by creating false Demand Drafts by using cheque leaves. This was done for the purpose of producing before the Check Post, when live chicken was being transported in bulk from different parts of Tamil Nadu to Kerala. The Demand Drafts were produced towards Value Added Tax to be paid by dealers while transporting live chicken from other States to Kerala. A huge loss to the tune of Rs. 14 crores was caused to the Government. The offences were detected when the Demand Drafts were sent to Bank.

3. Petitioner was taken into custody on 30.1.2010. 25 cases were registered against him. The arrest of petitioner in this case was recorded on 28.4.2010. In all the cases together, petitioner is in custody for the past about five months. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that he has no objection in granting bail, taking into consideration the stage of investigation and the fact that certain co-accused were granted bail. Petitioner himself was granted bail in some other cases.

4. On hearing both sides, I am satisfied that bail can be granted to petitioner on conditions. Hence, the following order is passed:

Petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court concerned, on the following conditions:

(i) Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer on every Monday and Thursday between 10 a.m. and 1 p.m. for a period of two months and thereafter, on every Monday, until charge sheet is filed or until further orders.

(ii) Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate any witness or tamper with evidence.

(iii) In case the petitioner is involved in any offence of similar nature, his bail is liable to be cancelled.

Petition is allowed.

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2010 Same Parties Santhoshkumar vs State of Kerala Same Subject Criminal Same Judge K. Hema, J., Acts & Sections Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 420, 465, 468 an...

Criminal