Shylaja Vs. Sujith and ors.

Shylaja vs Sujith and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 19, 2010

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/903418

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/903418
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: R. Basant and; M.C. Hari Rani, JJ.
Decided On: May 19, 2010
Case Number: WP (Crl.) No. 278 of 2007 (S)
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

JUDGMENT R. Basant, J. 1. The matter remains defective even now. The learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has now become unnecessary and can be dismissed. 2. Request accepted. The Writ Petition is dismissed. -

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shylaja

Advocate S. Sanal Kumar, Adv.

Respondent

Sujith and ors.

Advocate S. Abdul Razzak, Adv.

Excerpt

judgment r. basant, j. 1. the matter remains defective even now. the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has now become unnecessary and can be dismissed. 2. request accepted. the writ petition is dismissed. - .....detenue queency was undergoing her studies in the st.joseph's college for women, alappuzha. the petitioner and her daughter were staying in a working women's hostel and she was attending the college as a day-scholar. it is alleged that the alleged detenue was missing on 22.10.2007. information is said to have received from respondents 1 to 3 that the petitioner's daughter was with them. it is for releasing her that the present petition is filed. 3. the alleged detenue queency was produced before us by the 5th respondent. we interacted with her as also the petitioner-the mother. the alleged detenue stated before us that she has gone to the house of respondents 1 and 2 on her own accord. it appears that the alleged detenue developed some intimacy with the first respondent. however, it admits of, no doubt, that the first respondent is under the age of 21 and the petitioner's daughter under the age of 18 and therefore have not reached the marriageable age. the mother told that she is prepared to admit her daughter in the hostel attached to the college where she is studying. we record the same. being a minor, the mother is given interim custody of the child. the mother may admit the girl in the st.joseph's women's hostel, alappuzha so as to enable her to pursue her studies. the principal of the college, we have no doubt, will admit her in the hostel without delay. we further direct that the petitioner shall not compel queency for any marriage against her wish. a copy of this order shall be issued to the petitioner for enabling her to serve the same to the college authorities for information and compliance. we adjourn this case for reporting compliance to 13.12.2007. issue emergent copy.

Full Judgment

ORDER

04.12.2007

1. This writ of habeas corpus is filed praying for a direction to the respondents to produce the body of the petitioner's daughter by name Queency before this court and to set her at liberty.

2. The petitioner is the mother who is a Lower Division Clerk working in the Office of the R.D.O., Alappuzha. Petitioner has got two children, of which elder is the son and the alleged detenue is the daughter. The alleged detenue Queency was undergoing her studies in the St.Joseph's College for Women, Alappuzha. The petitioner and her daughter were staying in a Working Women's Hostel and she was attending the College as a day-scholar. It is alleged that the alleged detenue was missing on 22.10.2007. Information is said to have received from respondents 1 to 3 that the petitioner's daughter was with them. It is for releasing her that the present petition is filed.

3. The alleged detenue Queency was produced before us by the 5th respondent. We interacted with her as also the petitioner-the mother. The alleged detenue stated before us that she has gone to the house of respondents 1 and 2 on her own accord. It appears that the alleged detenue developed some intimacy with the first respondent. However, it admits of, no doubt, that the first respondent is under the age of 21 and the petitioner's daughter under the age of 18 and therefore have not reached the marriageable age. The mother told that she is prepared to admit her daughter in the hostel attached to the College where she is studying. We record the same. Being a minor, the mother is given interim custody of the child. The mother may admit the girl in the St.Joseph's Women's Hostel, Alappuzha so as to enable her to pursue her studies. The Principal of the College, we have no doubt, will admit her in the Hostel without delay. We further direct that the petitioner shall not compel Queency for any marriage against her wish. A copy of this order shall be issued to the petitioner for enabling her to serve the same to the College authorities for information and compliance.

We adjourn this case for reporting compliance to 13.12.2007.

Issue emergent copy.

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2010 Same Parties Shylaja vs Sujith and ors. Same Subject Criminal Same Judge R. Basant and; M.C. Hari Rani, JJ.

Criminal