Sunil Kumar.Vs. State.

Sunil Kumar. vs State.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Aug 30, 2010

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/902333

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/902333
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: Shiv Narayan Dhingra,J.
Decided On: Aug 30, 2010
Case Number: Crl. Revision No.406 of 2008
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[K.L. MANJUNATH,;B.MANOHAR,JJ.]This m pa filed under section 37(1) (a) of the Arbitration and conciliation act, against the order dated:21.08.2010, passed on I A.no.2 in A.A. no.733/2010 on the file of the city civil .judge (arbitral court), bangalore, issuing notice on i.a.no.2 filed u/s 9 of arbitration and concil...

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sunil Kumar.

Advocate Mr. Raman Sahney,; Mr. Santosh Kumar,Advs.

Respondent

State.

Advocate Mr. O.P. Saxena,Adv.

Excerpt

[k.l. manjunath,;b.manohar,jj.]this m pa filed under section 37(1) (a) of the arbitration and conciliation act, against the order dated:21.08.2010, passed on i a.no.2 in a.a. no.733/2010 on the file of the city civil .judge (arbitral court), bangalore, issuing notice on i.a.no.2 filed u/s 9 of arbitration and conciliation act r/w order 39 rule 1 and 2 & sec. 151 of cpc, for this appeal coming on for admission this day, manjunath j, delivered the following;1. whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2. to be referred to the reporter or not?3. whether judgment should be reported in digest?order1. in view of my decision in baharat @ popat v state bail appln. no.1943/2009, this petition is not maintainable and is hereby dismissed

Full Judgment

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporter or not?

3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?

ORDER

1. In view of my decision in Baharat @ Popat v State Bail Appln. No.1943/2009, this petition is not maintainable and is hereby dismissed

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2010 Same Parties Sunil Kumar. vs State. Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Shiv Narayan Dhingra,J.

Land Acquisition