Dones Vs. Urrutia

Dones vs Urrutia

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1906

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/90204

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/90204
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1906
Case Number: 202 U.S. 614
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dones

Respondent

Urrutia

Excerpt

dones v. urrutia - 202 u.s. 614 (1906) u.s. supreme court dones v. urrutia, 202 u.s. 614 (1906) 202 u.s. 614 francisco dones, appellant, v. jose urrutia, warden of the penitentiary of porto rico. no. 685. supreme court of the united states may 28, 1906 messrs. frederic d. mckenney and j. spalding flannery for appellant. the attorney general and the solicitor general for appellee. final order affirmed with costs. act april 12, 1900 (31 stat. at l. 77, chap. 191, 15, 33, 34, 35); ortega v. lara, 202 u.s. 339 , 50 l. ed . --, 26 sup. ct. rep. 707; perez v. fernandez, 202 u.s. 80 , 50 l. ed. --, 26 sup. ct. rep. 561; porto rican laws & code of civ. proc. 1904, pp. 103, 104, 110; ex parte ward, 173 u.s. 454, 43 l. ed. 765, 19 sup. ct. rep. 459; united states v. bellingham bay boom co., 176 u.s. 214, 44 l. ed. 440, 20 sup. ct. rep. 343.

Full Judgment

DONES v. URRUTIA - 202 U.S. 614 (1906)
U.S. Supreme Court DONES v. URRUTIA, 202 U.S. 614 (1906)

202 U.S. 614

FRANCISCO DONES, Appellant,
v.
JOSE URRUTIA, Warden of the Penitentiary of Porto Rico.
No. 685.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 28, 1906

Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney and J. Spalding Flannery for appellant.

The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for appellee.

Final order affirmed with costs. Act April 12, 1900 (31 Stat. at L. 77, chap. 191, 15, 33, 34, 35); Ortega v. Lara, 202 U.S. 339 , 50 L. ed . --, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 707; Perez v. Fernandez, 202 U.S. 80 , 50 L. ed. --, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 561; Porto Rican Laws & Code of Civ. Proc. 1904, pp. 103, 104, 110; Ex parte Ward, 173 U.S. 454, 43 L. ed. 765, 19 Sup. Ct. Rep. 459; United States v. Bellingham Bay Boom Co., 176 U.S. 214, 44 L. ed. 440, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 343.

Same Parties Dones vs Urrutia Same Subject Land Acquisition