Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Wheeler Vs. Plumas County

Wheeler vs Plumas County

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-20-1905
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/89972

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
196 U.S. 562
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Wheeler

Respondent

Plumas County

Excerpt

wheeler v. plumas county - 196 u.s. 562 (1905) u.s. supreme court wheeler v. plumas county, 196 u.s. 562 (1905) wheeler v. plumas county no. 122 submitted january 12, 1905 decided february 20, 1905 196 u.s. 562 certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the ninth circuit syllabus decided on authority of flanigan v. sierra county, ante, p. 196 u. s. 553 . the facts are stated in the opinion. page 196 u. s. 563 mr. justice mc kenna delivered the opinion of the court. this case was submitted with flanigan v. sierra county. it is also an action for the recovery of a sum of $2,100, alleged to be due for license tax, and $50 damages. the taxes were imposed under an ordinance of the county of plumas substantially similar to the ordinance passed on in flanigan v. sierra county. the action was brought in the superior court of plumas county and removed, upon the petition of the petitioners herein, to the circuit court for the northern district of california. in that court, petitioners demurred to the complaint, which being overruled and they declining to answer, judgment was taken against them by default. it was affirmed by the circuit court of appeals. the questions are identical with those passed on in flanigan v. sierra county, and, on the authority of that case, the judgment is reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings.

Full Judgment

Wheeler v. Plumas County - 196 U.S. 562 (1905)
U.S. Supreme Court Wheeler v. Plumas County, 196 U.S. 562 (1905)

Wheeler v. Plumas County

No. 122

Submitted January 12, 1905

Decided February 20, 1905

196 U.S. 562

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT

OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SYLLABUS

Decided on authority of Flanigan v. Sierra County, ante, p. 196 U. S. 553 .

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Page 196 U. S. 563

MR. JUSTICE Mc KENNA delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case was submitted with Flanigan v. Sierra County. It is also an action for the recovery of a sum of $2,100, alleged to be due for license tax, and $50 damages. The taxes were imposed under an ordinance of the County of Plumas substantially similar to the ordinance passed on in Flanigan v. Sierra County. The action was brought in the Superior Court of Plumas County and removed, upon the petition of the petitioners herein, to the Circuit Court for the Northern District of California. In that court, petitioners demurred to the complaint, which being overruled and they declining to answer, judgment was taken against them by default. It was affirmed by the circuit court of appeals.

The questions are identical with those passed on in Flanigan v. Sierra County, and, on the authority of that case, the

Judgment is reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial