Lowe Vs. U S

Lowe vs U S

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-08-1904

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/89726

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/89726
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Apr-08-1904
Case Number: 194 U.S. 193
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lowe

Respondent

U S

Excerpt

lowe v. u s - 194 u.s. 193 (1904) u.s. supreme court lowe v. u s, 194 u.s. 193 (1904) 194 u.s. 193 john lowe, appt., v. united states. no. 212. supreme court of the united states argued april 8, 1904 april 25, 1904 messrs. a. a. hoehling, jr., and charles l. fraliey for appellant. assistant attorney general pradt and mr. john q. thompson for appellee. mr. justice day delivered the opinion of the court: this case involves the same question, upon identical facts, as to the pay of a retired rear admiral, just disposed of in the case of gibson v. united states, 193 u. s. --, ante, 613, 24 sup. ct. rep. 613. for the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the court of claims, dismissing the petition of the appellant, is affirmed. mr. justice brewer took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Full Judgment

LOWE v. U S - 194 U.S. 193 (1904)
U.S. Supreme Court LOWE v. U S, 194 U.S. 193 (1904)

194 U.S. 193

JOHN LOWE, Appt.,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 212.

Supreme Court of the United States
Argued April 8, 1904

April 25, 1904

Messrs. A. A. Hoehling, Jr., and Charles L. Fraliey for appellant.

Assistant Attorney General Pradt and Mr. John Q. Thompson for appellee.

Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

This case involves the same question, upon identical facts, as to the pay of a retired rear admiral, just disposed of in the case of Gibson v. United States, 193 U. S. --, ante, 613, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 613.

For the reasons therein stated, The judgment of the Court of Claims, dismissing the petition of the appellant, is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Brewer took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Same Parties Lowe vs U S Same Subject Criminal