Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Smith Vs. Payne

Smith vs Payne

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-11-1904
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/89722

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
194 U.S. 104
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smith

Respondent

Payne

Excerpt

smith v. payne - 194 u.s. 104 (1904) u.s. supreme court smith v. payne, 194 u.s. 104 (1904) smith v. payne no. 481 argued march 10, 1904 decided april 11, 1904 194 u.s. 104 appeal from the court of appeals of the district of columbia syllabus what are periodicals and second class matter decided on authority of houghton v. payne, ante, p. 194 u. s. 88 . this was also a bill, filed by the firm of street & smith, to enjoin the postmaster general from cancelling certain certificates of entry admitting the publications of complainant firm to the mail as second-class mail matter. this case took the same course as the preceding one. mr. justice brown delivered the opinion of the court. plaintiffs are the publishers of several different series of novels under the names of the columbia library, the bertha clay library, the magnet detective library, the medal library, the undine library, the eden series, the arrow library, and some others. the books of these series are apparently of an inferior class of literature, and are numbered consecutively; but the only thing to indicate that they are issued periodically is a notice upon the outside of the back cover, in small type, that they are weekly or semi-monthly publications. the considerations moving us to affirm the decree of the court of appeals in the case of houghton v. payne, just decided, apply with much greater persuasiveness to this case, and the decree dismissing the bill is therefore affirmed. mr. justice harlan and the chief justice dissent in this case for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in houghton v. payne, ante, p. 194 u. s. 88 , and bates & guild co. v. payne, post, 194 u. s. 106 .

Full Judgment

Smith v. Payne - 194 U.S. 104 (1904)
U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. Payne, 194 U.S. 104 (1904)

Smith v. Payne

No. 481

Argued March 10, 1904

Decided April 11, 1904

194 U.S. 104

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SYLLABUS

What are periodicals and second class matter decided on authority of Houghton v. Payne, ante, p. 194 U. S. 88 .

This was also a bill, filed by the firm of Street & Smith, to enjoin the Postmaster General from cancelling certain certificates of entry admitting the publications of complainant firm to the mail as second-class mail matter. This case took the same course as the preceding one.

MR. JUSTICE BROWN delivered the opinion of the Court.

Plaintiffs are the publishers of several different series of novels under the names of The Columbia Library, The Bertha Clay Library, The Magnet Detective Library, The Medal Library, The Undine Library, The Eden Series, The Arrow Library, and some others. The books of these series are apparently of an inferior class of literature, and are numbered consecutively; but the only thing to indicate that they are issued periodically is a notice upon the outside of the back cover, in small type, that they are weekly or semi-monthly publications.

The considerations moving us to affirm the decree of the court of appeals in the case of Houghton v. Payne, just decided, apply with much greater persuasiveness to this case, and the decree dismissing the bill is therefore

Affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and the CHIEF JUSTICE dissent in this case for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Houghton v. Payne, ante, p. 194 U. S. 88 , and Bates & Guild Co. v. Payne, post, 194 U. S. 106 .

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial