Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Selden Vs. Montague

Selden vs Montague

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-25-1904
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/89714

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
194 U.S. 153
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Direct Taxation

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Selden

Respondent

Montague

Excerpt

selden v. montague - 194 u.s. 153 (1904) u.s. supreme court selden v. montague, 194 u.s. 153 (1904) 194 u.s. 153 william s. selden, william h. anderson, and clarence b. gilpin, appts., v. andrew j. montague, governor of virginia; david q. eggleston, secretary of the commonwealth of virginia; morton marye, auditor of public accounts of virginia, et al. no. 190. argued april 4, 5, 1904. decided april 25, 1904. mr. john s. wise for appellants. messrs. william a. anderson and frank w. christian for appellees. page 194 u.s. 153, 154 mr. justice brewer delivered the opinion of the court: this is a suit in equity brought to obtain by injunction the same relief as was sought in the preceding case. the facts and conditions are substantially similar, and for the reasons there given the appeal will be dismissed without costs to either party.

Full Judgment

SELDEN v. MONTAGUE - 194 U.S. 153 (1904)
U.S. Supreme Court SELDEN v. MONTAGUE, 194 U.S. 153 (1904)

194 U.S. 153

WILLIAM S. SELDEN, William H. Anderson, and Clarence B. Gilpin, Appts.,
v.
ANDREW J. MONTAGUE, Governor of Virginia; David Q. Eggleston, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Virginia; Morton Marye, Auditor of Public Accounts of Virginia, et al.
No. 190.

Argued April 4, 5, 1904.
Decided April 25, 1904.

Mr. John S. Wise for appellants.

Messrs. William A. Anderson and Frank W. Christian for appellees.

Page 194 U.S. 153, 154

Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a suit in equity brought to obtain by injunction the same relief as was sought in the preceding case. The facts and conditions are substantially similar, and for the reasons there given the appeal will be dismissed without costs to either party.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial