Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Himanshu Bimal Mitra Vs. the State

Himanshu Bimal Mitra vs The State

Type Court Judgment Court Guwahati Decided Oct 16, 1950
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/893224

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Guwahati High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Himanshu Bimal Mitra

Respondent

The State

Legal References

Reported In
1951CriLJ1360

Excerpt

- orderthadani, c.j.1. in this case, petitioner asks for leave to send a habeas corpus petition to the supreme court of india against an order of his detention. it appears that the petitioner applied to this court for release in the matter of his detention under the preventive detention act of 1950 iv 4. of 1950) under an order dated 18-3-50. in due course the petition was dismissed by this court on 16 6 80,2. it is not necessary for the petitioner to ask for leave to move another habeas corpus petition to the supreme court of india. if so advised, he can move the supreme court of india directly under the provisions of article 32 of the constitution of india. the petition is disposed of accordingly.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Thadani, C.J.

1. In this case, petitioner asks for leave to send a Habeas Corpus petition to the Supreme Court of India against an order of his detention. It appears that the petitioner applied to this Court for release in the matter of his detention under the Preventive Detention Act of 1950 IV 4. of 1950) under an order dated 18-3-50. In due course the petition was dismissed by this Court on 16 6 80,

2. It is not necessary for the petitioner to ask for leave to move another Habeas Corpus petition to the Supreme Court of India. If so advised, he can move the Supreme Court of India directly under the provisions of Article 32 of the Constitution of India. The petition is disposed of accordingly.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial