Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Armstrong Vs. United States

Armstrong vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-27-1901
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/89042

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
182 U.S. 243
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Armstrong

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

armstrong v. united states - 182 u.s. 243 (1901) u.s. supreme court armstrong v. united states, 182 u.s. 243 (1901) armstrong v. united states no. 609 argued january 8-11, 1901 decided may 27, 1901 82 u.s. 243 appeal from the court of claims syllabus dooley v. united states, ante, 182 u. s. 222 , followed. this was a petition to the court of claims by a british subject, to recover duties exacted by the collector of the port of san juan, and paid under protest, upon goods, wares, and merchandise of the growth, produce, or manufacture of the united states, between august 12, 1898, and december 5, 1899. the same demurrer was filed and the same judgment was entered as in the preceding case. page 182 u. s. 244 mr. justice brown delivered the opinion of the court. this case is controlled by the case of dooley v. united states, no. 501, just decided. so far as the duties were exacted upon goods imported prior to the ratification of the treaty of april 11, 1899, they were properly exacted. so far as they were imposed upon importations after that date and prior to december 5, 1899, plaintiff is entitled to recover them back. the judgment of the court of claims is therefore reversed, and the case remanded to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Full Judgment

Armstrong v. United States - 182 U.S. 243 (1901)
U.S. Supreme Court Armstrong v. United States, 182 U.S. 243 (1901)

Armstrong v. United States

No. 609

Argued January 8-11, 1901

Decided May 27, 1901

82 U.S. 243

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS

SYLLABUS

Dooley v. United States, ante, 182 U. S. 222 , followed.

This was a petition to the Court of Claims by a British subject, to recover duties exacted by the collector of the port of San Juan, and paid under protest, upon goods, wares, and merchandise of the growth, produce, or manufacture of the United States, between August 12, 1898, and December 5, 1899.

The same demurrer was filed and the same judgment was entered as in the preceding case.

Page 182 U. S. 244

MR. JUSTICE BROWN delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case is controlled by the case of Dooley v. United States, No. 501, just decided. So far as the duties were exacted upon goods imported prior to the ratification of the Treaty of April 11, 1899, they were properly exacted. So far as they were imposed upon importations after that date and prior to December 5, 1899, plaintiff is entitled to recover them back.

The judgment of the Court of Claims is therefore reversed, and the case remanded to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial