Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re Vidal

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-12-1900
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/88827

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
179 U.S. 126
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re Vidal

Excerpt

.....numbered 88, of brigadier-general davis of the united states army, then commanding the department of porto rico and the supreme military authority in that island, in the nature of a quo warranto to oust vidal and others from page 179 u. s. 127 the municipal offices of the town of guayama. the application was submitted april 23, 1900, and, as usual, time was given for a brief in opposition, which was presented april 30. section 716 of the revised statutes, brought forward from section 14 of the judiciary act of 1789, provides: "the supreme court and the circuit and district courts shall have power to issue writs of scire facias. they shall also have power to issue all writs not specifically provided for by statute, which may be necessary for the exercise of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law." this court is not thereby empowered to review the proceedings of military tribunals by certiorari. nor are such tribunals courts with jurisdiction in law or equity within the meaning of those terms as used in the third article of the constitution, and the question of the issue of the writ of certiorari in the exercise of inherent general power cannot arise in respect of them. by act of congress of april 12, 1900, 31 stat. 77 c. 191, taking effect, by its terms, on the first of may, the tribunal in question was, as the act states, discontinued, and a united states district court established as its successor, authorized to take possession of its records and to take jurisdiction of all cases and proceedings pending therein. the result is, from either point of view, that this application cannot be entertained. leave denied.

Full Judgment

In re Vidal - 179 U.S. 126 (1900)
U.S. Supreme Court In re Vidal, 179 U.S. 126 (1900)

In re Vidal

No Number

Submitted April 23, 1900

Decided November 12, 1900

179 U.S. 126

ORIGINAL

SYLLABUS

Section 716, Rev.Stat., does not empower this Court to review the proceedings of military tribunals by certiorari.

The Act of April 12, 1900, c.191, having discontinued the tribunal established under that act and created a successor authorized to take possession of its records and to take jurisdiction of all cases and proceedings pending therein, this Court has no jurisdiction to review its proceedings.

Such tribunals are not courts with jurisdiction in law or equity within the meaning of those terms as used in Article Three of the Constitution.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was an application for leave to file a petition for certiorari to review the proceedings of a tribunal established by a General Order, numbered 88, of Brigadier-General Davis of the United States Army, then commanding the Department of Porto Rico and the supreme military authority in that island, in the nature of a quo warranto to oust Vidal and others from

Page 179 U. S. 127

the municipal offices of the Town of Guayama. The application was submitted April 23, 1900, and, as usual, time was given for a brief in opposition, which was presented April 30.

Section 716 of the Revised Statutes, brought forward from section 14 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, provides:

"The Supreme Court and the circuit and district courts shall have power to issue writs of scire facias. They shall also have power to issue all writs not specifically provided for by statute, which may be necessary for the exercise of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law."

This Court is not thereby empowered to review the proceedings of military tribunals by certiorari. Nor are such tribunals courts with jurisdiction in law or equity within the meaning of those terms as used in the third Article of the Constitution, and the question of the issue of the writ of certiorari in the exercise of inherent general power cannot arise in respect of them.

By Act of Congress of April 12, 1900, 31 Stat. 77 c. 191, taking effect, by its terms, on the first of May, the tribunal in question was, as the act states, discontinued, and a United States district court established as its successor, authorized to take possession of its records and to take jurisdiction of all cases and proceedings pending therein.

The result is, from either point of view, that this application cannot be entertained.

Leave denied.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial