Lalit Kumar Sen Vs. Emperor

Lalit Kumar Sen vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Oct 15, 1925

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/887458

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/887458
Court: Kolkata
Judge: N.R. Chatterjea and ;B.B. Ghose, JJ.
Decided On: Oct 15, 1925
Subject: Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 421 - Appeal--Record sent for--Summary dismissal. -

Key legal issue: Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lalit Kumar Sen

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In: AIR1926Cal174,92Ind.Cas.894

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), section 421 - appeal--record sent for--summary dismissal. - 1. after the record was sent for and received, the learned sessions judge ought to have heard the pleader and ought not to have dismissed the appeal summarily without hearing him. the order dismissing the appeal summarily is accordingly set aside and the appeal is sent back to him to be re-heard according to law.

Full Judgment

1. After the record was sent for and received, the learned Sessions Judge ought to have heard the Pleader and ought not to have dismissed the appeal summarily without hearing him. The order dismissing the appeal summarily is accordingly set aside and the appeal is sent back to him to be re-heard according to law.

Same Parties Lalit Kumar Sen vs Emperor Same Subject Miscellaneous Same Judge N.R. Chatterjea and ;B.B. Ghose, JJ.

Miscellaneous