Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

In Re: Harold Tucker

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Jan 15, 1912
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/886840

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Christian Marriage Act (XV of 1872), Sections 41, 46 - Jewess--Divorce--Intended marriage with Christian--Registrar, refusal by, to solemnize marriage--High Court--Direction to solemnize marriage. -

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Harold Tucker

Legal References

Reported In
15Ind.Cas.398

Excerpt

christian marriage act (xv of 1872), sections 41, 46 - jewess--divorce--intended marriage with christian--registrar, refusal by, to solemnize marriage--high court--direction to solemnize marriage. - chitty, j.1. the senior marriage registrar of calcutta do, under the provisions of act xv of 1872, receive and publish the notice of the intended marriage given to him in writing in the form prescribed in and by the said act and, upon compliance with the provisions of section 41 of the said act take all of such stops as may be necessary for the solemnization of the marriage intended to be held between the said harold tucker and isabella landeman in the said petition named.

Full Judgment

Chitty, J.

1. The senior Marriage Registrar of Calcutta do, under the provisions of Act XV of 1872, receive and publish the notice of the intended marriage given to him in writing in the form prescribed in and by the said Act and, upon compliance with the provisions of Section 41 of the said Act take all of such stops as may be necessary for the solemnization of the marriage intended to be held between the said Harold Tucker and Isabella Landeman in the said petition named.

Continue Your Research

Same Parties In Re: Harold Tucker vs Same Subject Education Same Judge Chitty, J.
Education

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales