Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Darsing Nakma Vs. Emperor

Darsing Nakma vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Dec 15, 1910
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/886629

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Assam - Garo Hills--Regulation III of 1884--High Court--Jurisdiction--Laskars--Tribal Chiefs--Compensation for affront--Fine. -

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Darsing Nakma

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
9Ind.Cas.114

Excerpt

assam - garo hills--regulation iii of 1884--high court--jurisdiction--laskars--tribal chiefs--compensation for affront--fine. - 1. it is clear from the rules framed under the assam regulation that we have no jurisdiction to deal with this matter. it appears that the petty magistrates who are known as laskars and who appear to be nothing but tribal chiefs have jurisdiction to grant compensation for any kind of affront committed in connection with any petty complaint. a fortiori the magistrate had full jurisdiction to do the same. in fact calling it fine makes no difference as the code of criminal procedure is not in force in those districts.2. the rule is discharged.

Full Judgment

1. It is clear from the rules framed under the Assam Regulation that we have no jurisdiction to deal with this matter. It appears that the petty Magistrates who are known as Laskars and who appear to be nothing but tribal Chiefs have jurisdiction to grant compensation for any kind of affront committed in connection with any petty complaint. A fortiori the Magistrate had full jurisdiction to do the same. In fact calling it fine makes no difference as the Code of Criminal Procedure is not in force in those districts.

2. The rule is discharged.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial