Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

In Re: Celica Developers P. Ltd. (No. 1) and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Mar 29, 2007
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/886323

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
C.A. No. 259 of 2007
Subject
Company

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Company
Acts & sections
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391(1) and 393

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Celica Developers P. Ltd. (No. 1) and ors.

Advocate Manju Bhuteria, Adv.

Legal References

Acts
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391(1) and 393
Reported In
[2008]145CompCas154(Cal)

Excerpt

- indira banerjee, j.1. in this application under sections 391(1) and 393 of the companies act, 1956, summons for directions were taken out for dispensing with the meetings of the shareholders of the applicants.2. the prayer is allowed, since the written consent of all the shareholders of the applicant-company have been annexed in original to the affidavit in support of the summons.'3. summons be signed as on date.4. the application is thus disposed of.5. urgent certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

Full Judgment

Indira Banerjee, J.

1. In this application under Sections 391(1) and 393 of the Companies Act, 1956, summons for directions were taken out for dispensing with the meetings of the shareholders of the applicants.

2. The prayer is allowed, since the written consent of all the shareholders of the applicant-company have been annexed in original to the affidavit in support of the summons.'

3. Summons be signed as on date.

4. The application is thus disposed of.

5. Urgent certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kolkata · 2007 Same Parties In Re: Celica Developers P. Ltd. (No. 1) and ors. vs Same Subject Company Same Judge Indira Banerjee, J. Acts & Sections Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391(1) and 393
Company

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales