Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Binode Behari Pati Vs. Chaudhuri and Co.

Binode Behari Pati vs Chaudhuri and Co.

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Feb 24, 1919
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/885070

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Civil Procedure Code (Act V of 1908), Order XXIII, Rule 1 - Withdrawal of suit--Additional evidence, desire to adduce, whether sufficient ground for permitting withdrawal. -

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Binode Behari Pati

Respondent

Chaudhuri and Co.

Legal References

Reported In
50Ind.Cas.453

Excerpt

civil procedure code (act v of 1908), order xxiii, rule 1 - withdrawal of suit--additional evidence, desire to adduce, whether sufficient ground for permitting withdrawal. - 1. this rule is directed against an order by which the learned subordinate judge of burdwan allowed the plaintiff, who was the appellant before him, to withdraw his appeal and also the original suit with liberty to bring a fresh suit in respect of the same cause of action. in his order he has not stated what in his judgment were the sufficient grounds for permitting the plaintiff to take this course. but from the petition supported by affidavit before us and not controverted by the appellant, it appears that the plaintiff's reason for desiring to withdraw the appeal and suit was that he desired to adduce additional evidence. that is not a proper reason for permitting the plaintiff-appellant to withdraw his appeal and suit.2. we, therefore, set aside this order and direct that the appeal be re admitted and heard and determined on the merits.3. the plaintiff-appellant not appearing here we make no order as to costs in this rule.

Full Judgment

1. This Rule is directed against an order by which the learned Subordinate Judge of Burdwan allowed the plaintiff, who was the appellant before him, to withdraw his appeal and also the original suit with liberty to bring a fresh suit in respect of the same cause of action. In his order he has not stated what in his judgment were the sufficient grounds for permitting the plaintiff to take this course. But from the petition supported by affidavit before us and not controverted by the appellant, it appears that the plaintiff's reason for desiring to withdraw the appeal and suit was that he desired to adduce additional evidence. That is not a proper reason for permitting the plaintiff-appellant to withdraw his appeal and suit.

2. We, therefore, set aside this order and direct that the appeal be re admitted and heard and determined on the merits.

3. The plaintiff-appellant not appearing here we make no order as to costs in this Rule.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial