Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dirajaddi and anr. Vs. Emperor

Dirajaddi and anr. vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Oct 05, 1915
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/882716

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Section 225 - Thief, custody of, by chowkidar--Rescue--Offence--Chowkidar, if Police Officer--Village Chowkidari Act (VI of 1870, B.C.), Sections 29 and 40. -

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dirajaddi and anr.

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Cases Referred
and Kalai v. Kalu Chowkidar
Reported In
33Ind.Cas.644

Excerpt

penal code (act xlv of 1860), section 225 - thief, custody of, by chowkidar--rescue--offence--chowkidar, if police officer--village chowkidari act (vi of 1870, b.c.), sections 29 and 40. - 1. we make this rule absolute on the authorities to which we are referred, namely, bolai dey v. emperor 35 c. 361 : 12 c.w.n. 367 : 7 cr. l.j. 188; puna chandra kundu v. emperor 20 ind. cas. 750 : 17 c.w.n. 978 : 14 cr. l.j. 494 : 41 c. 7 and kalai v. kalu chowkidar 27 c. 366 : 4 c.w.n. 252.2. we set aside the convictions and sentences and direct that the bail bonds be discharged.

Full Judgment

1. We make this Rule absolute on the authorities to which we are referred, namely, Bolai Dey v. Emperor 35 C. 361 : 12 C.W.N. 367 : 7 Cr. L.J. 188; Puna Chandra Kundu v. Emperor 20 Ind. Cas. 750 : 17 C.W.N. 978 : 14 Cr. L.J. 494 : 41 C. 7 and Kalai v. Kalu Chowkidar 27 C. 366 : 4 C.W.N. 252.

2. We set aside the convictions and sentences and direct that the bail bonds be discharged.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial