Spalding Vs. Dickinson

Spalding vs Dickinson

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1896

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/88212

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/88212
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1896
Case Number: 161 U.S. 499
Subject: Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue: Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Spalding

Respondent

Dickinson

Excerpt

spalding v. dickinson - 161 u.s. 499 (1896) u.s. supreme court spalding v. dickinson, 161 u.s. 499 (1896) 161 u.s. 499 spalding v. dickinson. no. 82. march 2, 1896 w. willoughby, for plaintiff in error. asst. atty. gen. dickinson, for defendant in error. mr. justice harlan delivered the opinion of the court. the defendant in error succeeded mr. vilas in the office of postmaster general. the declaration in the present case is in all material respects like that in spalding v. vilas (just decided) 16 sup. ct. 631. for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case the judgment is affirmed.

Full Judgment

SPALDING v. DICKINSON - 161 U.S. 499 (1896)
U.S. Supreme Court SPALDING v. DICKINSON, 161 U.S. 499 (1896)

161 U.S. 499

SPALDING
v.
DICKINSON.
No. 82.

March 2, 1896

W. Willoughby, for plaintiff in error.

Asst. Atty. Gen. Dickinson, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant in error succeeded Mr. Vilas in the office of postmaster general. The declaration in the present case is in all material respects like that in Spalding v. Vilas (just decided) 16 Sup. Ct. 631. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case the judgment is affirmed.

Same Parties Spalding vs Dickinson Same Subject Miscellaneous