Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hemanta Kumar Sen Vs. Emperor

Hemanta Kumar Sen vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Jul 15, 1921
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/879854

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Calcutta Suburban Police Act (II B.C. of 1866), Sections 18, 51 - Stall on which soda-water is sold not for consumption on premises, whether 'place of public resort.' -

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hemanta Kumar Sen

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1923Cal135,62Ind.Cas.577

Excerpt

calcutta suburban police act (ii b.c. of 1866), sections 18, 51 - stall on which soda-water is sold not for consumption on premises, whether 'place of public resort.' - .....rs. 5. the petitioner has a stall on the kalighat road, where from he sells soda-water and other aerated waters and non-intoxicating beverages. the only question that arises in this rule is whether that place is a place of public resort and entertainment' within the meaning of section 18 of act ii (b.c.) of 1866. in section 51 of the act, 'a place, of public entertainment' is defined as 'a place, whether enclosed or open, to which the public are admitted, and where any kind of food, drink or drug is supplied for consumption on the premises for the profit or gain of any person owning or having an interest in or managing such place and shall include a refreshment room, eating house, coffee house, tea-shop, liquor-house, boarding house, lodging-bouse, hotel, restaurant, tavern, wine-shop, beer-shop, spirit shop, arras-shop, toddy-shop, ganja-shop, bhang shop and opium-shop.' the shop kept by the petitioner does not come within this definition, because there is no place to which the public are admitted, nor are the drinks supplied to the public, supplied to them for consumption on the premises. we do not think that, if it is not a place of public entertainment, it can be held to be a place of public resort within the meaning of section 18 of the act. the words used in that section are 'or other place of public resort and entertainment' and they follow the words, 'keeps any cooffe-house, boarding-house, eating house, lodging house.' applying the principle of e(sic)usdem generis to these words, we hold that a stall on which soda water is sold not for consumption on the premises cannot be held to be a place of public resort within the meaning of section 18 of act ii (b c) of 1866. taking this view, it follows that the petitioner committed no offence in selling these articles without a license for the sale thereof, we accordingly make this rule absolute, set aside the conviction of the petitioner and direct that the fine, if paid, be refunded.

Full Judgment

1. The petitioner has been convicted under Section 18 of the Calcutta Suburban Police Act (II B.C. of 1866) and sentenced to pay fine of Rs. 5. The petitioner has a stall on the Kalighat Road, where from he sells soda-water and other aerated waters and non-intoxicating beverages. The only question that arises in this Rule is whether that place is a place of public resort and entertainment' within the meaning of Section 18 of Act II (B.C.) of 1866. In Section 51 of the Act, 'a place, of public entertainment' is defined as 'a place, whether enclosed or open, to which the public are admitted, and where any kind of food, drink or drug is supplied for consumption on the premises for the profit or gain of any person owning or having an interest in or managing such place and shall include a refreshment room, eating house, coffee house, tea-shop, liquor-house, boarding house, lodging-bouse, hotel, restaurant, tavern, wine-shop, beer-shop, spirit shop, arras-shop, toddy-shop, ganja-shop, bhang shop and opium-shop.' The shop kept by the petitioner does not come within this definition, because there is no place to which the public are admitted, nor are the drinks supplied to the public, supplied to them for consumption on the premises. We do not think that, if it is not a place of public entertainment, it can be held to be a place of public resort within the meaning of Section 18 of the Act. The words used in that section are 'or other place of public resort and entertainment' and they follow the words, 'keeps any cooffe-house, boarding-house, eating house, lodging house.' Applying the principle of e(Sic)usdem generis to these words, we hold that a stall on which soda water is sold not for consumption on the premises cannot be held to be a place of public resort within the meaning of Section 18 of Act II (B C) of 1866. Taking this view, it follows that the petitioner committed no offence in selling these articles without a license for the sale thereof, We accordingly make this Rule absolute, set aside the conviction of the petitioner and direct that the fine, if paid, be refunded.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial