Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cooper Vs. Newell

Cooper vs Newell

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jan-07-1895
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/87960

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
155 U.S. 532
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cooper

Respondent

Newell

Excerpt

cooper v. newell - 155 u.s. 532 (1895) u.s. supreme court cooper v. newell, 155 u.s. 532 (1895) cooper v. newell no. 129 submitted december 18, 1894 decided january 7, 1895 155 u.s. 532 error to the circuit court of the united states for the eastern district of texas syllabus horne v. george h. hammond co., 155 u. s. 393 , affirmed and applied. trespass to try title. the premises in dispute were alleged in the plaintiff's petition to be "of the value of fifty thousand dollars." the allegations therein respecting the citizenship of the parties were as follows: "the petition of stewart newell, a resident citizen of the city of new york, in the state of new york, hereinafter styled plaintiff, complaining of eliza cooper, b. p. cooper, and fannie westrope, all residents of galveston county, in the state of texas, and hereinafter styled defendants." no other allegations on this point were made below, and no question of jurisdiction was raised there. verdict and judgment for plaintiff. defendant sued out this writ of error. in his brief filed in this court, the counsel for the plaintiffs in error said: "we here assign as ground for reversal the further error that the court had no jurisdiction of the cause, in that the citizenship of the defendants is not disclosed by the record. the petition complains of defendants 'all residents of galveston county, in the state of texas.' nothing further on the subject is reflected by the record. " page 155 u. s. 533 the chief justice. the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings, upon the authority of horne v. george h. hammond company, ante, 155 u. s. 393 , and cases cited. reversed.

Full Judgment

Cooper v. Newell - 155 U.S. 532 (1895)
U.S. Supreme Court Cooper v. Newell, 155 U.S. 532 (1895)

Cooper v. Newell

No. 129

Submitted December 18, 1894

Decided January 7, 1895

155 U.S. 532

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SYLLABUS

Horne v. George H. Hammond Co., 155 U. S. 393 , affirmed and applied.

Trespass to try title. The premises in dispute were alleged in the plaintiff's petition to be "of the value of fifty thousand dollars." The allegations therein respecting the citizenship of the parties were as follows:

"The petition of Stewart Newell, a resident citizen of the City of New York, in the State of New York, hereinafter styled plaintiff, complaining of Eliza Cooper, B. P. Cooper, and Fannie Westrope, all residents of Galveston County, in the State of Texas, and hereinafter styled defendants."

No other allegations on this point were made below, and no question of jurisdiction was raised there. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant sued out this writ of error. In his brief filed in this Court, the counsel for the plaintiffs in error said:

"We here assign as ground for reversal the further error that the court had no jurisdiction of the cause, in that the citizenship of the defendants is not disclosed by the record. The petition complains of defendants 'all residents of Galveston County, in the State of Texas.' Nothing further on the subject is reflected by the record. "

Page 155 U. S. 533

THE CHIEF JUSTICE.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the Circuit Court for further proceedings, upon the authority of Horne v. George H. Hammond Company, ante, 155 U. S. 393 , and cases cited.

Reversed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial