Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hara Mohan Das Vs. Emperor

Hara Mohan Das vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Feb 19, 1926
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/879473

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Sections 196, 471 - Offence established under Section 471--Conviction under Section 196, legality of--Procedure. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hara Mohan Das

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Cases Referred
Empress v. Kherode Chunder Mozumdar
Reported In
96Ind.Cas.119

Excerpt

penal code (act xlv of 1860), sections 196, 471 - offence established under section 471--conviction under section 196, legality of--procedure. - 1. in this case the accused has been convicted under section 196, indian penal code. a perusal of the judgment of the learned magistrate shown that there should not have been a conviction under section 196 having regard to the facts found see in this connection empress v. kherode chunder mozumdar 5 c. 717 : 6 c.l.r. 118 : 3 shome l.r. cr. r. 20 : 2 ind. dec. (n.s.) 1063. the facts found -show that the section of the indian penal code under which the accused should uava been charged is section 471, indian penal code. an offence under section 471 is exclusively triable by a court of. session, and on the findings arrived at by the magistrate, it would appear that there is a prima facie case against the accused under section 471, indian penal code.2. we, therefore, set aside the conviction and sentence under section 196, indian penal code, and direct the magistrate to commit the accused to the court of session to stand his trial under section 471, indian penal code. with these remarks let the record be sent down to the lower court as early as possible.6. the petitioner who is on bail will remain on the same bail as he is now, pending further orders of the magistrate.

Full Judgment

1. In this case the accused has been convicted under Section 196, Indian Penal Code. A perusal of the judgment of the learned Magistrate shown that there should not have been a conviction under Section 196 having regard to the facts found see in this connection Empress v. Kherode Chunder Mozumdar 5 C. 717 : 6 C.L.R. 118 : 3 Shome L.R. Cr. R. 20 : 2 Ind. Dec. (N.S.) 1063. The facts found -show that the section of the Indian Penal Code under which the accused should uava been charged is Section 471, Indian Penal Code. An offence under Section 471 is exclusively triable by a Court of. Session, and on the findings arrived at by the Magistrate, it would appear that there is a prima facie case against the accused under Section 471, Indian Penal Code.

2. We, therefore, set aside the conviction and sentence under Section 196, Indian Penal Code, and direct the Magistrate to commit the accused to the Court of Session to stand his trial under Section 471, Indian Penal Code. With these remarks let the record be sent down to the lower Court as early as possible.

6. The petitioner who is on bail will remain on the same bail as he is now, pending further orders of the Magistrate.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial