Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Basir Sheikh and ors. Vs. Fazle Karim Biswas and ors.

Basir Sheikh and ors. vs Fazle Karim Biswas and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided May 13, 1914
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/877819

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Appeal - Decree for joint possession in favour of several plaintiffs--Appeal dismissed against some plaintiffs--Appeal, whether can be heard. -

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Basir Sheikh and ors.

Respondent

Fazle Karim Biswas and ors.

Legal References

Cases Referred
and Tarip Dafadar v. Khotejannessu Bibi
Reported In
AIR1915Cal786(1),28Ind.Cas.703

Excerpt

appeal - decree for joint possession in favour of several plaintiffs--appeal dismissed against some plaintiffs--appeal, whether can be heard. - 1. this is an appeal by the defendants in a suit for possession of land. the decree is one for joint possession in favour of five plaintiffs. all these plaintiffs were joined as respondents to the appeal. the appellants, however, failed to serve notices of the appeal on two of them and the result was that this court directed the appeal to be dismissed in so far as those two plaintiffs-respondents were concerned. the appeal has now come before us for disposal in so far as it is directed against the remaining three plaintiffs-respondents.2. a preliminary objection has been taken that the appeal should not be heard, because, as the decree was one for joint possession of land, whatever view may be taken by this court on the merits, the entire decree can be executed by the two plaintiffs against whom the appeal has been dismissed. in our opinion this objection is fatal and must be allowed. the view we take is supported by the decision of this court in the cases of bejoy gopal bose v. umesh chandra bose 6 c.w.n. 196 and tarip dafadar v. khotejannessu bibi 10 c.w.n. 981.3. the result is that this appeal is dismissed with costs.

Full Judgment

1. This is an appeal by the defendants in a suit for possession of land. The decree is one for joint possession in favour of five plaintiffs. All these plaintiffs were joined as respondents to the appeal. The appellants, however, failed to serve notices of the appeal on two of them and the result was that this Court directed the appeal to be dismissed in so far as those two plaintiffs-respondents were concerned. The appeal has now come before us for disposal in so far as it is directed against the remaining three plaintiffs-respondents.

2. A preliminary objection has been taken that the appeal should not be heard, because, as the decree was one for joint possession of land, whatever view may be taken by this Court on the merits, the entire decree can be executed by the two plaintiffs against whom the appeal has been dismissed. In our opinion this objection is fatal and must be allowed. The view we take is supported by the decision of this Court in the cases of Bejoy Gopal Bose v. Umesh Chandra Bose 6 C.W.N. 196 and Tarip Dafadar v. Khotejannessu Bibi 10 C.W.N. 981.

3. The result is that this appeal is dismissed with costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial