Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

BucklIn Vs. United States

Bucklin vs United States

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-18-1895
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/87754

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
159 U.S. 680
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bucklin

Respondent

United States

Excerpt

bucklin v. united states - 159 u.s. 680 (1895) u.s. supreme court bucklin v. united states , 159 u.s. 680 (1895) bucklin v. united states (no. 1) no. 246 submitted october 21, 1895 decided november 18, 1895 159 u.s. 680 appeal from the district court of the united states for the district of kansas syllabus the final judgment of a court of the united states in a case of the conviction of a capital or otherwise infamous crime is not reviewable here except on writ of error, and the review is confined to questions of law, properly presented. page 159 u. s. 681 the case is stated in the opinion. mr. justice harlan delivered the opinion of the court. the appellant, bucklin, was convicted of the crime of perjury, under § 5392 of the revised statutes, and sentenced to imprisonment at hard labor in the penitentiary for the term of one and one-half years, and also to pay a fine of one hundred dollars. he seeks a review of that judgment by the present appeal. the appeal must be dismissed. by section five of the act of march 3, 1891, 26 stat. 826, c. 517, "appeals or writs of error may be taken from the district courts or from the existing circuit courts" of the united states directly to this court, in certain enumerated cases, civil and criminal -- among others, "in cases of conviction of a capital or otherwise infamous crime." there was no purpose by that act to abolish the general distinction at common law between an appeal and a writ of error. the final judgment of a court of the united states in a case of the conviction of a capital or otherwise infamous crime is not reviewable here except upon writ of error. our review of the judgment, when brought here in that form, is confined to questions of law, properly presented by a bill of exceptions or arising upon the record. appeal dismissed.

Full Judgment

Bucklin v. United States - 159 U.S. 680 (1895)
U.S. Supreme Court Bucklin v. United States , 159 U.S. 680 (1895)

Bucklin v. United States (No. 1)

No. 246

Submitted October 21, 1895

Decided November 18, 1895

159 U.S. 680

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

SYLLABUS

The final judgment of a court of the United States in a case of the conviction of a capital or otherwise infamous crime is not reviewable here except on writ of error, and the review is confined to questions of law, properly presented.

Page 159 U. S. 681

The case is stated in the opinion.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

The appellant, Bucklin, was convicted of the crime of perjury, under § 5392 of the Revised Statutes, and sentenced to imprisonment at hard labor in the penitentiary for the term of one and one-half years, and also to pay a fine of one hundred dollars. He seeks a review of that judgment by the present appeal.

The appeal must be dismissed. By section five of the Act of March 3, 1891, 26 Stat. 826, c. 517, "appeals or writs of error may be taken from the district courts or from the existing circuit courts" of the United States directly to this Court, in certain enumerated cases, civil and criminal -- among others, "in cases of conviction of a capital or otherwise infamous crime." There was no purpose by that act to abolish the general distinction at common law between an appeal and a writ of error. The final judgment of a court of the United States in a case of the conviction of a capital or otherwise infamous crime is not reviewable here except upon writ of error. Our review of the judgment, when brought here in that form, is confined to questions of law, properly presented by a bill of exceptions or arising upon the record.

Appeal dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial