Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chandra Mohan Nanda Vs. Empreror

Chandra Mohan Nanda vs Empreror

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Dec 07, 1917
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/876541

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Section 193 - Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 195--Perjury--Sanction to prosecute--Discrepancy owing to inaccuracy of mind. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chandra Mohan Nanda

Respondent

Empreror

Legal References

Reported In
43Ind.Cas.822

Excerpt

penal code (act xlv of 1860), section 193 - criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), section 195--perjury--sanction to prosecute--discrepancy owing to inaccuracy of mind. - 1. we think that in this case the rule should be made absolute. the statements made by the witness whose prosecution for perjury has been ordered do not appear to be deliberate false statements so much as statements slightly discrepant due to inaccuracy of mind. it does not appear from the witness' deposition that he was desirous of saving the accused. indeed, it appears that he actually sent word to the thana through the chaukidar. the rule is accordingly made absolute and the proceedings against the petitioner under section 193, indian penal code, are quashed.

Full Judgment

1. We think that in this case the Rule should be made absolute. The statements made by the witness whose prosecution for perjury has been ordered do not appear to be deliberate false statements so much as statements slightly discrepant due to inaccuracy of mind. It does not appear from the witness' deposition that he was desirous of saving the accused. Indeed, it appears that he actually sent word to the thana through the chaukidar. The Rule is accordingly made absolute and the proceedings against the petitioner under Section 193, Indian Penal Code, are quashed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial