Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Radharaman Saha Vs. Emperor

Radharaman Saha vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Mar 02, 1931
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/875880

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Radharaman Saha

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1931Cal712

Excerpt

- cuming, j.1. the facts of the case will appear from the judgment of the learned magistrate. the petitioner has been convicted under section 157, i. p.c.2. the case is briefly that on a certain day two persons who are what are described as volunteers came to the house of the petitioner and he gave them food.3. the magistrate finds that by so doing he harboured these persons and that he was aware that these two had formed or were likely to have formed an unlawful assembly the common object of which was the commission of an offence punishable under section 4 of the ordinance of 1930. on the findings of the learned magistrate no offence under section 157 has been committed.4. the magistrate finds that the petitioner was aware that in some past time the two volunteers had formed or were likely to have formed an unlawful assembly.5. section 157, i. p.c. clearly refers to some unlawful assembly in the future it provides for an occurrence which may happen not which has happened. the findings of the learned magistrate do not justify a conviction under section 157.6. the conviction and sentence must therefore be set aside and the petitioner acquitted. the fine if paid must be refunded.

Full Judgment

Cuming, J.

1. The facts of the case will appear from the judgment of the learned Magistrate. The petitioner has been convicted under Section 157, I. P.C.

2. The case is briefly that on a certain day two persons who are what are described as volunteers came to the house of the petitioner and he gave them food.

3. The Magistrate finds that by so doing he harboured these persons and that he was aware that these two had formed or were likely to have formed an unlawful assembly the common object of which was the commission of an offence punishable under Section 4 of the Ordinance of 1930. On the findings of the learned Magistrate no offence under Section 157 has been committed.

4. The Magistrate finds that the petitioner was aware that in some past time the two volunteers had formed or were likely to have formed an unlawful assembly.

5. Section 157, I. P.C. clearly refers to some unlawful assembly in the future It provides for an occurrence which may happen not which has happened. The findings of the learned Magistrate do not justify a conviction under Section 157.

6. The conviction and sentence must therefore be set aside and the petitioner acquitted. The fine if paid must be refunded.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial