Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Parma Singh and ors. Vs. Emperor

Parma Singh and ors. vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Jan 27, 1911
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/873186

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Sections 95 and 144 - Slight harm--Deadly weapon--Lathi--Trumpery quarrel. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Parma Singh and ors.

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
9Ind.Cas.586

Excerpt

penal code (act xlv of 1860), sections 95 and 144 - slight harm--deadly weapon--lathi--trumpery quarrel. - .....cannot be regarded as in any way a deadly weapon unless and until it is used on the head or on some vital part of a person. on the legal ground put forward by the learned judge, therefore, this reference should never have been made furthermore, it should never have been made on the very plain ground which both sides have clearly established before us that the whole matter was a trumpery quarrel which no person of ordinary sense or temper would complain of and there was absolutely nothing to cause any harm to any body. it was an unfortunate incident that the two parties had collected outside their respective houses and apparently said 'come, come', to each other but the upshot of it was that no body did come and nothing happened. that this trumpery quarrel should be perpetuated by a solemn trial in a criminal court seems to us lamentable; and it had better been dropped altogether.4. the convictions and sentences are set aside not upon the ground referred to by the sessions judge but on the ground that the case falls within section 95, indian penal code.5. this order will apply to reference nos. 299 and 300 of 1910 and revision nos. 1 and 50 of 1911.

Full Judgment

1. A reference was made to us by the learned Sessions Judge of Arrah recommending that the convictions and sentences in two cases separately tried should be set aside and a re-trial ordered on the ground that the cases were not properly triable summarily because they were under Section 144, Indian Penal Code.

2. Now, the first error that we have to point out to the learned Judge is that two separate references ought to have been made to us, so that we might deal with the cases separately, but in addition to the reference he has made, both sides have moved us in Revision on the ground that there was no occurrence of any criminal nature at all.

3. The second point that we wish to draw attention to, is that a lathi is not in itself a deadly weapon. It performs precisely the same function in ordinary life in this country as a walking stick does in other countries; it is, universally used by every body in the moffussil and it certainly cannot be regarded as in any way a deadly weapon unless and until it is used on the head or on some vital part of a person. On the legal ground put forward by the learned Judge, therefore, this reference should never have been made Furthermore, it should never have been made on the very plain ground which both sides have clearly established before us that the whole matter was a trumpery quarrel which no person of ordinary sense or temper would complain of and there was absolutely nothing to cause any harm to any body. It was an unfortunate incident that the two parties had collected outside their respective houses and apparently said 'come, come', to each other but the upshot of it was that no body did come and nothing happened. That this trumpery quarrel should be perpetuated by a solemn trial in a Criminal Court seems to us lamentable; and it had better been dropped altogether.

4. The convictions and sentences are set aside not upon the ground referred to by the Sessions Judge but on the ground that the case falls within Section 95, Indian Penal Code.

5. This order will apply to Reference Nos. 299 and 300 of 1910 and Revision Nos. 1 and 50 of 1911.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial