Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Benode Behary Nath Vs. Emperor

Benode Behary Nath vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Jul 28, 1922
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/871545

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Sections 123, 193 (2) - Reference under Section 123--Additional Sessions Judge, jurisdiction of. -

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Benode Behary Nath

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
81Ind.Cas.61

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), sections 123, 193 (2) - reference under section 123--additional sessions judge, jurisdiction of. - walmsley, j.1. this rule relates to a reference under the provisions of section 123, criminal procedure code. the sessions judge of the 24-parganas tran-ferred the hearing of the reference to the first additional sessions judge and the rule was obtanfed calling upon the district magistrate to show cause why that order of transfer should not be set aside on the ground that such references can be heard only by the sessions judge himself. mr. monnier on behalf of the petitioner has examined the criminal procedure code exhaustively dealing with all the sections which he thinks have a bearing on the question. of these section 193, clause (2) seems to me most important and i am not prepared to whittle it down in the manner which mr. monnier suggests. i do not see any reason why it should not be interpreted in a liberal sense and i think that the notification published by the government of bengal, circular judicial no. 113 j.d. of the 19th of june 1916 purporting to be an order under clause (2) of section 193, criminal procedure code does authorize the sessions judge to transfer such cases to the additional sessions judge for disposal. i, therefore, think that the first additional sessions judge has jurisdiction to hear the reference. the rule is accordingly discharged. let the record be returned to the lower court at once.2. chotzner, j.--i agree.

Full Judgment

Walmsley, J.

1. This Rule relates to a Reference under the provisions of Section 123, Criminal Procedure Code. The Sessions Judge of the 24-Parganas tran-ferred the hearing of the Reference to the First Additional Sessions Judge and the Rule was obtanfed calling upon the District Magistrate to show cause why that order of transfer should not be set aside on the ground that such References can be heard only by the Sessions Judge himself. Mr. Monnier on behalf of the petitioner has examined the Criminal Procedure Code exhaustively dealing with all the sections which he thinks have a bearing on the question. Of these Section 193, Clause (2) seems to me most important and I am not prepared to whittle it down in the manner which Mr. Monnier suggests. I do not see any reason why it should not be interpreted in a liberal sense and I think that the Notification published by the Government of Bengal, Circular Judicial No. 113 J.D. of the 19th of June 1916 purporting to be an order under Clause (2) of Section 193, Criminal Procedure Code does authorize the Sessions Judge to transfer such cases to the Additional Sessions Judge for disposal. I, therefore, think that the First Additional Sessions Judge has jurisdiction to hear the Reference. The Rule is accordingly discharged. Let the record be returned to the lower Court at once.

2. Chotzner, J.--I agree.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial