Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abdul Wahab Vs. Chandia

Abdul Wahab vs Chandia

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Aug 17, 1886
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/871447

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Magistrate, Jurisdiction of - Powers of Second Class Magistrates--Reference to District Magistrate--Committal to Court of Sessions--Criminal Procedure Code, Section 239. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abdul Wahab

Respondent

Chandia

Legal References

Cases Referred
and Imperatrix v. Abdulla I.L.R.
Reported In
(1886)ILR13Cal305

Excerpt

magistrate, jurisdiction of - powers of second class magistrates--reference to district magistrate--committal to court of sessions--criminal procedure code, section 239. - prinsep and ghose, jj.1. this case has been referred to the district magistrate under section 349 of the code of criminal procedure by the assistant magistrate who exercises powers of the second class, and has found the accused guilty under sections 406, 417 of the penal code, the sentence which he can pass being in his opinion inadequate. the district magistrate is of opinion that the offence committed is under section 420 of the penal code, which is an offence beyond the jurisdiction of the assistant magistrate to try.2. section 349 of the code of criminal procedure empowers the district magistrate to pass such judgment, sentence or order in the case as he thinks fit, and as is 'according to law.' now, although the assistant magistrate was not competent to hold a trial of an offence under section 420 of the penal code, he was competent to hold an inquiry, and commit to the court of sessions, so that he was not entirely without jurisdiction, and could have committed the case instead of referring it to the district magistrate. the district magistrate is moreover competent, in a case of this description, to pass such order as he thinks fit, and as is according to law, and he can consequently, if he thinks proper, commit the accused to the court of sessions. we may refer the district magistrate to the cases of in the matter of chinnimarigadu i.l.r. 1 mad. 289, and imperatrix v. abdulla i.l.r. 4 bom. 240.

Full Judgment

Prinsep and Ghose, JJ.

1. This case has been referred to the District Magistrate under Section 349 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the Assistant Magistrate who exercises powers of the second class, and has found the accused guilty under Sections 406, 417 of the Penal Code, the sentence which he can pass being in his opinion inadequate. The District Magistrate is of opinion that the offence committed is under Section 420 of the Penal Code, which is an offence beyond the jurisdiction of the Assistant Magistrate to try.

2. Section 349 of the Code of Criminal Procedure empowers the District Magistrate to pass such judgment, sentence or order in the case as he thinks fit, and as is 'according to law.' Now, although the Assistant Magistrate was not competent to Hold a trial of an offence under Section 420 of the Penal Code, he was competent to hold an inquiry, and commit to the Court of Sessions, so that he was not entirely without jurisdiction, and could have committed the case instead of referring it to the District Magistrate. The District Magistrate is moreover competent, in a case of this description, to pass such order as he thinks fit, and as is according to law, and he can consequently, if he thinks proper, commit the accused to the Court of Sessions. We may refer the District Magistrate to the cases of In the matter of Chinnimarigadu I.L.R. 1 Mad. 289, and Imperatrix v. Abdulla I.L.R. 4 Bom. 240.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial