Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Smith Vs. Gale

Smith vs Gale

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jan-05-1891
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/86899

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
137 U.S. 577
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smith

Respondent

Gale

Excerpt

smith v. gale - 137 u.s. 577 (1891) u.s. supreme court smith v. gale, 137 u.s. 577 (1890) smith v. gale no. 580 submitted december 22, 1890 decided january 5, 1891 137 u.s. 577 appeal from the supreme court of the territory of dakota syllabus the day of the entry of judgment or decree must be excluded in computing the time for taking an appeal or bringing a writ of error to review it. this was a motion to dismiss an appeal on the ground that it "was not taken within the time prescribed by law." it appeared that the final decree was entered of record by the supreme court of the territory of dakota, on the 25th of may, 1886. the appeal from this decision was allowed, the supersedeas bond was offered and the citation was signed on the 25th day of may, 1888, by the chief justice of that court, and these papers were all filed on that day in the clerk's office of that court. page 137 u. s. 578 mr. justice fuller delivered the opinion of the court. in computing the two years after the entry of a final judgment, decree, or order sought to be reviewed in this court, within which the writ of error must be brought or the appeal taken, the day of the entry of such judgment, decree, or order should be excluded. credit co. v. arkansas central railway, 128 u. s. 258 . the motion to dismiss the appeal in this cause is therefore denied.

Full Judgment

Smith v. Gale - 137 U.S. 577 (1891)
U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. Gale, 137 U.S. 577 (1890)

Smith v. Gale

No. 580

Submitted December 22, 1890

Decided January 5, 1891

137 U.S. 577

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE TERRITORY OF DAKOTA

SYLLABUS

The day of the entry of judgment or decree must be excluded in computing the time for taking an appeal or bringing a writ of error to review it.

This was a motion to dismiss an appeal on the ground that it "was not taken within the time prescribed by law." It appeared that the final decree was entered of record by the Supreme Court of the Territory of Dakota, on the 25th of May, 1886. The appeal from this decision was allowed, the supersedeas bond was offered and the citation was signed on the 25th day of May, 1888, by the chief justice of that court, and these papers were all filed on that day in the clerk's office of that court.

Page 137 U. S. 578

MR. JUSTICE FULLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

In computing the two years after the entry of a final judgment, decree, or order sought to be reviewed in this Court, within which the writ of error must be brought or the appeal taken, the day of the entry of such judgment, decree, or order should be excluded. Credit Co. v. Arkansas Central Railway, 128 U. S. 258 .

The motion to dismiss the appeal in this cause is therefore

Denied.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial