Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Queen-empress Vs. Ishwar Chandra Sur

Queen-empress vs ishwar Chandra Sur

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Oct 24, 1884
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/868384

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code - Act X of 1882, Sections 109, 110 and 112--Security for good behaviour. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Queen-empress

Respondent

ishwar Chandra Sur

Legal References

Reported In
(1885)ILR11Cal13

Excerpt

criminal procedure code - act x of 1882, sections 109, 110 and 112--security for good behaviour. - macpherson, j.1. we think the sessions judge is right and that the order must be set aside. the record does not show, and the magistrate in his explanation does not say, that the accused had an opportunity of entering upon his defence or of citing witnesses.2. it is, moreover, by no means clear that the accused knew whether the accusation which he bad to meet was one under section 109 or section 110 of the criminal procedure code.

Full Judgment

Macpherson, J.

1. We think the Sessions Judge is right and that the order must be set aside. The record does not show, and the Magistrate in his explanation does not say, that the accused had an opportunity of entering upon his defence or of citing witnesses.

2. It is, moreover, by no means clear that the accused knew whether the accusation which he bad to meet was one under Section 109 or Section 110 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial