Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re Ingalls, Petitioner

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-23-1891
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/86803

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
139 U.S. 548
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re Ingalls, Petitioner

Excerpt

in re ingalls, petitioner - 139 u.s. 548 (1891) u.s. supreme court in re ingalls, petitioner, 139 u.s. 548 (1891) in re ingalls, petitioner no number submitted march 16, 1891 decided march 23, 1891 139 u.s. 548 original syllabus no application to this court for a writ of error will be entertained, except when a justice of this court, upon consideration of the record, has deemed it proper, under special circumstances, to endorse thereon a request that counsel be permitted to proceed in that way. the case is stated in the opinion. page 139 u. s. 549 per curiam. this is an application for a writ of error made to the court in session, under the apprehension on the part of counsel that it was directed to be so presented. we have therefore considered it, with the result that the writ must be denied. dale tile mfg. co. v. hyatt, 125 u. s. 46 ; walter a. wood co. v. skinner, ante, 139 u. s. 293 . we wish it to be distinctly understood that in future, no such application will be entertained except when a justice of this court, upon consideration of the record, has deemed it proper, under special circumstances, to endorse thereon a request that counsel be permitted to proceed in that way. writ refused.

Full Judgment

In re Ingalls, Petitioner - 139 U.S. 548 (1891)
U.S. Supreme Court In re Ingalls, Petitioner, 139 U.S. 548 (1891)

In re Ingalls, Petitioner

No number

Submitted March 16, 1891

Decided March 23, 1891

139 U.S. 548

ORIGINAL

SYLLABUS

No application to this Court for a writ of error will be entertained, except when a Justice of this Court, upon consideration of the record, has deemed it proper, under special circumstances, to endorse thereon a request that counsel be permitted to proceed in that way.

The case is stated in the opinion.

Page 139 U. S. 549

PER CURIAM.

This is an application for a writ of error made to the Court in session, under the apprehension on the part of counsel that it was directed to be so presented. We have therefore considered it, with the result that the writ must be denied. Dale Tile Mfg. Co. v. Hyatt, 125 U. S. 46 ; Walter A. Wood Co. v. Skinner, ante, 139 U. S. 293 .

We wish it to be distinctly understood that in future, no such application will be entertained except when a Justice of this Court, upon consideration of the record, has deemed it proper, under special circumstances, to endorse thereon a request that counsel be permitted to proceed in that way.

Writ refused.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial