Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re Wood

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided May-11-1891
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/86737

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
140 U.S. 370
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re Wood

Excerpt

in re wood - 140 u.s. 370 (1891) u.s. supreme court in re wood, 140 u.s. 370 (1891) in re wood no. 1581 decided may 11, 1891 reported @ante,@ page 278 140 u.s. 370 appeal from the circuit court of the united states for the southern district of new york concurring opinion of mr. justice field mr. justice field, concurring. i concur in the judgment in this case, but not in all the views expressed in the opinion. i adhere to what i said in my dissent in the case of neal v. delaware, 103 u. s. 405 , 103 u. s. 409 , that there is nothing in the late amendments to the constitution, the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth, which requires that colored citizens shall be summoned on juries, page 140 u. s. 371 grand or petit, in order to secure to persons of their race justice and equality in the administration of the law, and further that the manner in which jurors serve in the state courts shall be selected and the qualifications they shall possess are matters entirely of state regulation.

Full Judgment

In re Wood - 140 U.S. 370 (1891)
U.S. Supreme Court In re Wood, 140 U.S. 370 (1891)

In re Wood

No. 1581

Decided May 11, 1891

Reported @ante,@ page 278

140 U.S. 370

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Concurring opinion of MR. JUSTICE FIELD

MR. JUSTICE FIELD, concurring.

I concur in the judgment in this case, but not in all the views expressed in the opinion. I adhere to what I said in my dissent in the case of Neal v. Delaware, 103 U. S. 405 , 103 U. S. 409 , that there is nothing in the late amendments to the Constitution, the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth, which requires that colored citizens shall be summoned on juries,

Page 140 U. S. 371

grand or petit, in order to secure to persons of their race justice and equality in the administration of the law, and further that the manner in which jurors serve in the state courts shall be selected and the qualifications they shall possess are matters entirely of state regulation.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial