Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

J.C. Stalkartt Vs. W. Stalkartt

J.C. Stalkartt vs W. Stalkartt

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Aug 17, 1900
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/867093

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Receiver--Practice--Application for appointment of Receiver, whether to be made in Chambers or Court. -

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

J.C. Stalkartt

Respondent

W. Stalkartt

Legal References

Cases Referred
Blackborough v. Ravenhill
Reported In
(1901)ILR28Cal250

Excerpt

receiver--practice--application for appointment of receiver, whether to be made in chambers or court. - stanley, j.1. this is not chambers application.2. mr. edwards.--an application, which is not an original application, bu is only an application to supply the place of a retiring receiver, may be mad in chambers. the application is moreover consented to. belchambers' practice, p. 99, citing grote v. bing 9 hare 50 blackborough v. ravenhill 16 jur. 1085.3. an application for the appointment of a receiver on the retirement of another receiver should be made in court and not in chambers.stanley, j.4. an application for the appointment of a receiver in place of the retiring receiver is not an application which should be made before the judge sitting in chambers, but should be in court. i accordingly direct that this application be renewed in court.5. the application was subsequently made by counsel in court and granted.

Full Judgment

Stanley, J.

1. This is not Chambers application.

2. Mr. Edwards.--An application, which is not an original application, bu is only an application to supply the place of a retiring Receiver, may be mad in Chambers. The application is moreover consented to. Belchambers' Practice, P. 99, citing Grote v. Bing 9 Hare 50 Blackborough v. Ravenhill 16 Jur. 1085.

3. An application for the appointment of a Receiver on the retirement of another Receiver should be made in Court and not in Chambers.

Stanley, J.

4. An application for the appointment of a Receiver in place of the retiring Receiver is not an application which should be made before the Judge sitting in Chambers, but should be in Court. I accordingly direct that this application be renewed in Court.

5. The application was subsequently made by Counsel in Court and granted.

Continue Your Research

Same Parties J.C. Stalkartt vs W. Stalkartt Same Subject Civil Same Judge Stanley, J.
Civil

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales