Smith Vs. U.S.

Smith vs U.S.

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1890

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/86608

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/86608
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1890
Case Number: 137 U.S. 224
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smith

Respondent

U.S.

Excerpt

smith v. u.s. - 137 u.s. 224 (1890) u.s. supreme court smith v. u.s., 137 u.s. 224 (1890) 137 u.s. 224 smith v. united states. key v. same. november 24, 1890 archibald stirling, jr., e. j. waring, and john henry keene, jr., for plaintiff in error. atty. gen. miller, for the united states. per curiam. no. 1,142, (smith v. u. s.,) and no. 1,144, (key v. same,) argued and decided at the same time, are substantially similar, and in those cases also the judgments are affirmed.

Full Judgment

SMITH v. U.S. - 137 U.S. 224 (1890)
U.S. Supreme Court SMITH v. U.S., 137 U.S. 224 (1890)

137 U.S. 224

SMITH
v.
UNITED STATES.

KEY
v.
SAME.

November 24, 1890

Archibald Stirling, Jr., E. J. Waring, and John Henry Keene, Jr., for plaintiff in error.

Atty. Gen. Miller, for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

No. 1,142, (Smith v. U. S.,) and No. 1,144, (Key v. Same,) argued and decided at the same time, are substantially similar, and in those cases also the judgments are affirmed.

Same Parties Smith vs U.S. Same Subject Land Acquisition