Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Queen-empress Vs. Karamdi

Queen-empress vs Karamdi

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Oct 29, 1895
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/865567

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1882), Section 438 - Power of the District Magistrate to question the propriety of a finding and sentence by the Sessions Judge. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Queen-empress

Respondent

Karamdi

Legal References

Reported In
(1896)ILR23Cal250

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act x of 1882), section 438 - power of the district magistrate to question the propriety of a finding and sentence by the sessions judge. - ghose and hill, jj.1. this is a reference by the district magistrate of mymensingh, at the instance of the commissioner of the dacca division, questioning the propriety of a finding and sentence by the sessions judge.2. we are not aware under what authority the reference has been made. such references have always been condemned by this court as irregular. the power given to a district magistrate to make a reference to the high court is conferred by section 438 read with section 435 of the criminal procedure code. but this clearly refers to a 'proceeding before any inferior criminal court;' and notwithstanding the words 'or otherwise,' in section 438, we do not think that the legislature ever intended to give to a magistrate the power to question the propriety of a judgment or sentence by a superior criminal authority, as the sessions judge is, and to refer the proceeding to the high court for revision. section 439 read with section 435 gives to the high court the authority to examine the record of any proceeding (whether it be of a sessions or magistrate's court, and howsoever it might have been brought up) and interfere with or alter the conviction or sentence or other order, but notwithstanding the use of the words 'or which has been reported for orders,' as in section 439, it could never have been intended that such report might be made by an inferior criminal authority with respect to a proceeding by a superior authority.3. we, therefore, decline to interfere in this matter.

Full Judgment

Ghose and Hill, JJ.

1. This is a reference by the District Magistrate of Mymensingh, at the instance of the Commissioner of the Dacca Division, questioning the propriety of a finding and sentence by the Sessions Judge.

2. We are not aware under what authority the reference has been made. Such references have always been condemned by this Court as irregular. The power given to a District Magistrate to make a reference to the High Court is conferred by Section 438 read with Section 435 of the Criminal Procedure Code. But this clearly refers to a 'proceeding before any inferior Criminal Court;' and notwithstanding the words 'or otherwise,' in Section 438, we do not think that the Legislature ever intended to give to a Magistrate the power to question the propriety of a judgment or sentence by a superior criminal authority, as the Sessions Judge is, and to refer the proceeding to the High Court for revision. Section 439 read with Section 435 gives to the High Court the authority to examine the record of any proceeding (whether it be of a Sessions or Magistrate's Court, and howsoever it might have been brought up) and interfere with or alter the conviction or sentence or other order, but notwithstanding the use of the words 'or which has been reported for orders,' as in Section 439, it could never have been intended that such report might be made by an inferior criminal authority with respect to a proceeding by a superior authority.

3. We, therefore, decline to interfere in this matter.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial