Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Remfry Vs. Depenning and anr.

Remfry vs Depenning and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Jul 23, 1884
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/863827

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Family

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Indian Succession Act (X of 1865), Section 282 - Judgment-creditor--Execution of Decree--Priority--Executor--Administrator--Administrator-General's Act (II of 1874), Section 35. -

Key legal issue
Family

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Remfry

Respondent

Depenning and anr.

Legal References

Cases Referred
Alliance Bank v. Hoff
Reported In
(1884)ILR10Cal929

Excerpt

indian succession act (x of 1865), section 282 - judgment-creditor--execution of decree--priority--executor--administrator--administrator-general's act (ii of 1874), section 35. - pigot, j.1. in this case execution must issue; section 35 of the administrator-general's act is limited to the express purpose for which it was enacted, and there is nothing in that act or in the civil procedure code to change the position of the administrator--general, or to put him in a better position than any ordinary suitor. i must follow the course pursued in the suit of the alliance bank v. hoff; unrep and execution must issue.

Full Judgment

Pigot, J.

1. In this case execution must issue; Section 35 of the Administrator-General's Act is limited to the express purpose for which it was enacted, and there is nothing in that Act or in the Civil Procedure Code to change the position of the Administrator--General, or to put him in a better position than any ordinary suitor. I must follow the course pursued in the suit of the Alliance Bank v. Hoff; Unrep and execution must issue.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial