Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lloyd Vs. Mcwilliams

Lloyd vs Mcwilliams

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-15-1890
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/86351

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
137 U.S. 576
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lloyd

Respondent

Mcwilliams

Excerpt

lloyd v. mcwilliams - 137 u.s. 576 (1890) u.s. supreme court lloyd v. mcwilliams, 137 u.s. 576 (1890) lloyd v. mcwilliams no. 109 argued and submitted december 10, 1890 decided december 15, 1890 137 u.s. 576 error to the circuit court of the united states for the district of rhode island syllabus when a trial by jury in a circuit court is waived by agreement and the case is tried by the court, no questions are open for revision here unless the record shows a finding of facts in accordance with the provisions of rev.stat. §§ 649, 700, and in such case, when brought here, the judgment of the circuit court will be presumed to be right and will be affirmed if it appears that that court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the parties. this was an action to recover duties alleged to have been illegally exacted. when the cause was reached on the docket, argument was begun on the part of the plaintiff in error, but the court interrupted the counsel and declined to hear further argument. the case is stated in the opinion. page 137 u. s. 577 mr. chief justice fuller delivered the opinion of the court.. in this cause, trial by jury was waived by agreement of the parties in writing, duly filed, and the case was tried by the court. but the record discloses no finding upon the facts, either general or special, in accordance with the statutes (rev.stat. §§ 649, 700), and no questions are therefore open to our revision as an appellate tribunal. as the circuit court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and the parties, its judgment must be presumed to be right, and on that ground affirmed.

Full Judgment

Lloyd v. McWilliams - 137 U.S. 576 (1890)
U.S. Supreme Court Lloyd v. McWilliams, 137 U.S. 576 (1890)

Lloyd v. McWilliams

No. 109

Argued and submitted December 10, 1890

Decided December 15, 1890

137 U.S. 576

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

SYLLABUS

When a trial by jury in a circuit court is waived by agreement and the case is tried by the court, no questions are open for revision here unless the record shows a finding of facts in accordance with the provisions of Rev.Stat. §§ 649, 700, and in such case, when brought here, the judgment of the circuit court will be presumed to be right and will be affirmed if it appears that that court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the parties.

This was an action to recover duties alleged to have been illegally exacted. When the cause was reached on the docket, argument was begun on the part of the plaintiff in error, but the court interrupted the counsel and declined to hear further argument. The case is stated in the opinion.

Page 137 U. S. 577

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER delivered the opinion of the Court..

In this cause, trial by jury was waived by agreement of the parties in writing, duly filed, and the case was tried by the court. But the record discloses no finding upon the facts, either general or special, in accordance with the statutes (Rev.Stat. §§ 649, 700), and no questions are therefore open to our revision as an appellate tribunal. As the circuit court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and the parties, its judgment must be presumed to be right, and on that ground

Affirmed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial