Gaff Vs. Gottfried

Gaff vs Gottfried

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1888

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/86082

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/86082
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1888
Case Number: 128 U.S. 170
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gaff

Respondent

Gottfried

Excerpt

gaff v. gottfried - 128 u.s. 170 (1888) u.s. supreme court gaff v. gottfried, 128 u.s. 170 (1888) 128 u.s. 170 gaff et al. v. gottfried. hack et al. v. same. november 5, 1888 r. h. parkinson, for appellant. e. banning and t. a. banning, for appellee. blatchford, j. these are appeals by the defendants in two suits brought by matthew gottfried, in the circuit court of the united states for the district of indiana, upon the same patent involved in the case of brewing co. v. gottfried, ante, 83, (just decided.) the proofs are the same as in that case, and the same conclusions are reached. the decree in each case is reversed, and each case is remanded to the circuit court, with a direction to dismiss the bill of complaint, with costs.

Full Judgment

GAFF v. GOTTFRIED - 128 U.S. 170 (1888)
U.S. Supreme Court GAFF v. GOTTFRIED, 128 U.S. 170 (1888)

128 U.S. 170

GAFF et al.
v.
GOTTFRIED.

HACK et al.
v.
SAME.

November 5, 1888

R. H. Parkinson, for appellant.

E. Banning and T. A. Banning, for appellee.

BLATCHFORD, J.

These are appeals by the defendants in two suits brought by Matthew Gottfried, in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Indiana, upon the same patent involved in the case of Brewing Co. v. Gottfried, ante, 83, (just decided.) The proofs are the same as in that case, and the same conclusions are reached. The decree in each case is reversed, and each case is remanded to the circuit court, with a direction to dismiss the bill of complaint, with costs.

Same Parties Gaff vs Gottfried Same Subject Land Acquisition