Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mozari Sajad Vs. Moshingan

Mozari Sajad vs Moshingan

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Jul 06, 1885
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/859681

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Appeal - Valuation of suit--Costs--Return of plaint---Jurisdiction--Code of Civil Procedure, Sections 15 and 57. -

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mozari Sajad

Respondent

Moshingan

Legal References

Cases Referred
Balkissen Dass v. Lutchmeeput Singh I.L.R.
Reported In
(1885)ILR12Cal271

Excerpt

appeal - valuation of suit--costs--return of plaint---jurisdiction--code of civil procedure, sections 15 and 57. - field, j.1. we think that according to the principle laid down in balkissen dass v. lutchmeeput singh i.l.r. 8 cal. 91 there is an appeal here on the subject of costs. the defendant contended in both the courts below that the court in which the plaint was filed had no jurisdiction. in that contention he was successful; and we think, therefore, that he ought not to be made to pay the plaintiff's costs; on the contrary he ought to have his own costs in both the lower courts. we, therefore, direct that he do get such costs. we feel bound to say that this is a matter which ought to have been set right by the subordinate judge without compelling the defendant to appeal to this court. the appeal is decreed with costs.2. the order so far as it directs the plaint to be returned will remain unaffected by our decree. although there is an appeal on this point, it is not pressed, as the plaint has been returned and the suit is proceeding in another court.

Full Judgment

Field, J.

1. We think that according to the principle laid down in Balkissen Dass v. Lutchmeeput Singh I.L.R. 8 Cal. 91 there is an appeal here on the subject of costs. The defendant contended in both the Courts below that the Court in which the plaint was filed had no jurisdiction. In that contention he was successful; and we think, therefore, that he ought not to be made to pay the plaintiff's costs; on the contrary he ought to have his own costs in both the lower Courts. We, therefore, direct that he do get such costs. We feel bound to say that this is a matter which ought to have been set right by the Subordinate Judge without compelling the defendant to appeal to this Court. The appeal is decreed with costs.

2. The order so far as it directs the plaint to be returned will remain unaffected by our decree. Although there is an appeal on this point, it is not pressed, as the plaint has been returned and the suit is proceeding in another Court.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial