Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Haidar Ali

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided Feb 18, 1886
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/859303

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Security for good behaviour - Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1882). Sections 110, 112. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Haidar Ali

Legal References

Reported In
(1885)ILR12Cal520

Excerpt

security for good behaviour - criminal procedure code (act x of 1882). sections 110, 112. - mcdonell and beverley, jj.1. we think that the proceedings of the bench in this case ought to be set aside on two grounds. in the first place the order made, under section 112 of the code of criminal procedure, does not comply with the provisions of that section. this is a mere technical irregularity; but on general grounds we think that the mere fact that the person from whom the security was demanded had been previously convicted of offences against property is not in itself sufficient to justify proceedings under section 110 of the code, unless there is additional evidence (which in this case there is not), that the person complained against has done some act, or resumed avocations that indicate on his part an intention to return to his former course of life, and to pursue a career of preying on the community. in this case the person from whom security was required had only recently been released from jail, and we think it was rather the duty of the police to assist him in finding honest employment than to apply to have him incarcerated for a further period merely on the ground of his previous convictions.2. we set aside the order of the bench and direct that haidar ali be released.

Full Judgment

McDonell and Beverley, JJ.

1. We think that the proceedings of the Bench in this case ought to be set aside on two grounds. In the first place the order made, under Section 112 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, does not comply with the provisions of that section. This is a mere technical irregularity; but on general grounds we think that the mere fact that the person from whom the security was demanded had been previously convicted of offences against property is not in itself sufficient to justify proceedings under Section 110 of the Code, unless there is additional evidence (which in this case there is not), that the person complained against has done some act, or resumed avocations that indicate on his part an intention to return to his former course of life, and to pursue a career of preying on the community. In this case the person from whom security was required had only recently been released from jail, and we think it was rather the duty of the Police to assist him in finding honest employment than to apply to have him incarcerated for a further period merely on the ground of his previous convictions.

2. We set aside the order of the Bench and direct that Haidar Ali be released.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial