Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dhiku and anr. Vs. Deno Nath Deb Alias Dinu and anr.

Dhiku and anr. vs Deno Nath Deb Alias Dinu and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Kolkata Decided May 18, 1888
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/858499

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kolkata
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Appeal in Criminal case - Cattle Trespass Act (I of 1871), Section 22--Illegal seizure of cattle. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dhiku and anr.

Respondent

Deno Nath Deb Alias Dinu and anr.

Legal References

Cases Referred
Empress v. Raja Lakshma
Reported In
(1888)ILR15Cal712

Excerpt

appeal in criminal case - cattle trespass act (i of 1871), section 22--illegal seizure of cattle. - wilson, j.1. we think that the ruling of the high court of bombay in queen-empress v. raja lakshma 10 b. 230, to which the sessions judge refers, is one that should be followed, and that no appeal lay to the deputy commissioner. we set aside his order and direct that the order of the first court be restored.

Full Judgment

Wilson, J.

1. We think that the ruling of the High Court of Bombay in Queen-Empress v. Raja Lakshma 10 B. 230, to which the Sessions Judge refers, is one that should be followed, and that no appeal lay to the Deputy Commissioner. We set aside his order and direct that the order of the first Court be restored.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial