Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

United States Vs. Dewalt

United States vs Dewalt

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Nov-19-1888
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/85830

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
128 U.S. 393
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

United States

Respondent

Dewalt

Excerpt

.....the court. mr. chief justice fuller delivered the opinion of the court. de walt, the appellee, was tried and convicted, upon an information, of the crime of embezzlement and making false entries as the president of a national bank in violation of § 5209 of the revised statutes, and sentenced and committed to the penitentiary for ten years. this section prescribes the punishment of imprisonment for not less than five nor more than ten years, which imprisonment may be ordered to be executed in a state jail or penitentiary. rev.stat. ยง 5541. appellee was subsequently discharged on habeas corpus upon the ground that the crime in question was an infamous crime for which he could not, under the constitution, be held to answer on information, but only on presentment or indictment by a grand jury. from the order discharging him, this appeal is prosecuted, and it is contended that a crime is not infamous which is not subject to the penalty of hard labor as part of the punishment of imprisonment. this, however, was otherwise ruled in mackin v. united states, 117 u. s. 348 , where this court held, speaking page 128 u. s. 394 through mr. justice gray, "that at the present day, imprisonment in a state prison or penitentiary, with or without hard labor, is an infamous punishment." that case is decisive of this, and the order appealed from must be affirmed.

Full Judgment

United States v. DeWalt - 128 U.S. 393 (1888)
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. DeWalt, 128 U.S. 393 (1888)

United States v. DeWalt

No. 81

Argued November 15, 1888

Decided November 19, 1888

128 U.S. 393

APPEAL FROM THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF WYOMING

SYLLABUS

On the authority of Mackin v. United States, 117 U. S. 348 , it is again held that imprisonment in a state prison or penitentiary, with or without hard labor, is an infamous punishment.

This was an appeal from a judgment on an application for a writ of habeas corpus discharging the prisoner. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER delivered the opinion of the Court.

De Walt, the appellee, was tried and convicted, upon an information, of the crime of embezzlement and making false entries as the president of a national bank in violation of § 5209 of the Revised Statutes, and sentenced and committed to the penitentiary for ten years. This section prescribes the punishment of imprisonment for not less than five nor more than ten years, which imprisonment may be ordered to be executed in a state jail or penitentiary. Rev.Stat. ยง 5541. Appellee was subsequently discharged on habeas corpus upon the ground that the crime in question was an infamous crime for which he could not, under the Constitution, be held to answer on information, but only on presentment or indictment by a grand jury. From the order discharging him, this appeal is prosecuted, and it is contended that a crime is not infamous which is not subject to the penalty of hard labor as part of the punishment of imprisonment.

This, however, was otherwise ruled in Mackin v. United States, 117 U. S. 348 , where this Court held, speaking

Page 128 U. S. 394

through MR. JUSTICE GRAY, "that at the present day, imprisonment in a state prison or penitentiary, with or without hard labor, is an infamous punishment."

That case is decisive of this, and the order appealed from must be

Affirmed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial